Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hey, Google... (Score 1) 98

Who should get trained? Whenever we have articles about forced computer science training in the US and coding being a required subject you same idiots claim it's not needed. Meanwhile, developers are pulling in 6 figure salaries .. so why in God's name are people still working retail and fast food WHEN YOU CAN GET TRAINED AND CERTIFIED on anything online for dirt CHEAP, if you're poor and want in-person classes .. community college is cheap or free with federal loans. There's really no excuse for bullshit nowadays. People DO NOT WANT TO DO COMPUTER SCIENCE. Try hiring people to a start up and see the salaries qualified or even unqualified people are asking for. People right out of college are, rightfully, asking 6 figures. And that's good, but it also means people are CHOOSING not to go into IT careers. They rather work in a retail store or fast food for $25 an hour (that's what In-n-Out is paying around me in Silicon Valley).

Comment Re:Uh good luck (Score 1) 13

Starlink will support 5G, IoT etc. before SES can start launching satellites. Starlink is about the size of a pizza box and consumes the same current as a 60 watt incadescent light bulb. If SES can make satellite communications work with a cell phone/under 1 watt, then why can't Starlink do that? In fact Starlink already demonstrated cell phone to cell phone texting (which means it can support IoT/LoRa). As for 5G I am sure that's on their radar, they have a deal with T-mobile .. you don't think the possibility of 5G hasn't come up? The assumption that Starlink is going to twiddle their thumbs doesn't really make sense.

Comment Uh good luck (Score 3, Interesting) 13

How are they going to get the satellites up there? SpaceX is the only provider who can do it cheaply AND has the launch cadence. Plus, Starlink has a 5+ year head start. Meaning if SES started work tomorrow, their first launch would be two or three years from now and then add another 5 to 7 years before their constellation is in place in any position to compete with Starlink -- by which time Starlink will be onto its Gen 2.

Comment You guys are dummies (Score 1) 44

The story isn't that foldable sales have decreased or that people don't want 'em. It's that there are Chinese alternatives undercutting Samsung. It's actually an argument in favor of foldable. This is like when in 1999 the atavista search engine started losing market share to Google. Back then you idiots would have said this means search engines are a fad. "In the first quarter of this year, the total size of China’s foldable smartphone market was 1.86 million units, up 83% from last year."

Comment It's too fucking heavy!! (Score 1) 148

600 grams is too heavy. Would you walk around with a 600 gram dumbbell on your face? It's good for a one-time 30 minute gimmick. Don't get me wrong, the visuals are amazing and what it can do is great, but it's not light enough to just wear casually .. nor is there good enough content on it. They need to get it down to at least 120 grams, which is totally possible because the Bigscreen Beyond weighs 120 grams .. so if a couple of guys in a garage can make a 120 gram VR headset (with 2.5K per eye displays) why can't Apple? They blundered by putting the CPU and fans etc. (all of which requires more accompanying infrastructure) in the headset instead of with the battery pack. That was a huge fucking blunder.

Slashdot Top Deals

Life is a whim of several billion cells to be you for a while.

Working...