Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Were singles released on 45 rpms? (Score 0) 409

I'm pretty sure their early singles (chronicled on the aptly-named The Early Singles and the 3-CD remaster of Piper at the Gates of Dawn) were released on 45s, as that was what everyone did back then. Being that it was 1966/1967, they even had mono mixes made in addition to the stereo. So, I can't imagine these singles having been put out on anything but 7-inch records that spun at 45 rpm.

Hm, I just Youtubed it, and I found a video of an only half-working copy of See Emily Play, and it's definitely a 45.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOEpAmg2NAI

But, when most people say "Pink Floyd" they mean "post-Barrett Pink Floyd". I dunno about their singles that came after. I think it's possible that they were radio-only singles, that is, no vinyl copies were ever mass-produced. That would be congruent with the fact that they've only just now caved in to individual digital downloads.

Comment Re:Someone needs to lose their job over this (Score 0) 224

Youtube comments are appreciably complex - You can type in a timecode and it appears in the comment as a link that directs the Flash to jump the specified point in the stream, for just one example. So the code that processes the comments is more complex than simply taking user input, scrubbing it, and writing it at the specified point in the HTML. As a developer, you should know that as the complexity of code increases, the potential for ever more weirdly complex bugs also increases. I don't know if we'll ever hear an explanation from Google about the specifics of the bugged code, but I wouldn't be so quick to deem whoever (or rather, whichever team) wrote it as totally incompetent and worthy of a pink slip.

Comment Re:How about a physical media that doesn't wear? (Score 0) 232

I, too, have long wondered about the frailty of optical discs. When Laserdiscs and CDs were developed in the 70s, I can understand them maybe not anticipating how important it would be to protect the media itself. Vinyl records were the standard then, and they get scratched very easily, and get damaged just by being left out of their sleeves (dust in the grooves). But there was fuck-all you could do to improve on that design. There was also an "Ohh, shiny!" factor. Optical discs were new, space-age technology. They were read by lasers. They had rainbows coming off of them in the light. People might have actually been impressed by the appearance of the disc itself, and they were used to walking on pins & needles handling their media, carefully holding it by the edges, and having it degrade with each play.

But what I can't understand is why now, 30 years later, we're still fucking around with bare optical discs. We're expected to keep carefully placing them in and out of their trays, but in the real world that often doesn't happen. They get put into those CD binders, they float around peoples' cars, people leave them lying on desks. They get scratched, it's a fact of life. And it could all be avoided with a simple plastic casing with a sliding door, built as a standard part of the medium, like you had on floppy disks. If not for simply the amount of time that discs have been around, DVDs and Blue-Rays pack way more bytes into a square inch. So they're much more susceptible to the scratches that occur when they come in contact with, well, any surface at all. And yet we still don't have protection.

I'd even go so far as to speculate that it may be intentional on the part of the companies that developed these standards. No casing on the disc means lower production costs (though, interesting thought: the casing and the "box" could become one). It also means more damaged discs. And a damaged disc is one that can't be re-sold. If the stuff on it is good enough, the consumer may even buy a new disc to replace it. Even better, he might buy the deluxe director's cut reissue on SACD -- another bare optical disc.

Comment Re:Penalty for speed (Score 0) 230

I'd hope that their algorithm is heavily weighted towards accuracy versus speed. Given that Google seems to know what they're doing most of the time, the speed of a site is probably only important enough to move it up or down a few places within a page of search results. I can't remember the last time I had to click past the first page of a Google result, anyway. Of course, there's no way to tell just how much it matters, since they keep the inner workings of PageRank secret.

Comment Re:You are right. (Score 1, Insightful) 235

If apps were "coded like console games"... *Every application would need to include device drivers for every piece of hardware on the system. For every system you want your app to run on. So that boils down to coding (or getting from the manufacturer) drivers for every computer device in existence. *There would be no multi-tasking. Let's say you are working on something in Microsoft Office. In order to look up something on Google real quick, you'd need to save your work, unload Office, load up Firefox, look up whatever you needed to, unload Firefox, re-load Office, and open your file back up. I could go on, but I don't feel like doing so in a reply to an AC. Simply put, there's a good reason that operating systems to exist. They act as an abstraction to the hardware, making development of applications *way* easier since you only have to code your program to interface with the APIs of an operating system, which in turn has drivers installed to work with whatever particular hardware is on a machine that you are trying to run your app on. I'm pretty sure all the game consoles developed in the past decade have their own pseudo-OS, to let Xbox Live etc. run concurrently with all the games. Or maybe they just have libraries for that stuff that they give to the developers to include in their games. Either way, it works because all PS2s/Xboxen/Wii are the same. That is not true of personal computers.

Comment Re:When will we get modular hard drives? (Score 0) 665

It would be easier and more cost-effective to just put a small amount of flash memory onto every motherboard. It could come pre-loaded with diagnostic tools, or if it didn't, you could just as easily add your own. Hell, maybe they could even just put a little SD card reader, so you could swap different cards in and out as you pleased.

Comment Re:Recycling skins and textures from other games? (Score 0) 101

I didn't find the design of Oblivion to be "amazingly competent". It would be a lie to say that I didn't enjoy playing it (with re-balancing mods). But Morrowind was balanced so much better. And I suppose the Fallout games, though I've never played them. Which I probably should.

Slashdot Top Deals

Gee, Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.

Working...