No, because it is a black box it gives no understanding of how the weather works and so does not qualify as a scientific theory, nor does it make any falsifiable predictions beyond those that fit the data set it was fed.
It's pretty amazing that software with "no understanding of how the weather works" (your words), beats out the science(TM) experts 90% of the time.
Which coincidently is exactly what the people who haven't fallen for the global warming hoax have said all along.
Something that doesn't know shit about the calculations beats the scientists(TM) "on more than 99% of weather variables".
You warmist clowns can go home now.