True, the NFL owns the right to footage of NFL games. But at least there isn't a "football company" that can shut down entire leagues under some sort of exclusive right. With e-sports, on the other hand, a video game's publisher can use copyright to take down a league's streams if it doesn't like the direction the league is taking.

I agree that adding an anthropomorphic rabbit would be humorously apropos, but it might attract parts of the furry fandom that Idthesda might not be interested in serving.

People with a Surface tablet* or a Lumia phone are more likely to use IE because there's no Firefox on Windows RT or Windows Phone. And IE has richer Group Policy support if that's your thing.

* Other than Surface Pro

Then where's the free upgrade for an Android 2.x device? Chrome requires Android 4.

I bought this Nexus 7 tablet on Google's store. Therefore I am the customer, no?

But why do local governments assess this tax? For what taxi-related city services does it pay?

Until Apple revokes the iOS Developer Program membership of the developer who is abusing TestFlight.

What steps Ubisoft take to avoid Guideline 15.3 in this case?

Only so many links can be shown at once in a given space. A menu makes more links available to the user than can be reasonably shown at once. Or are you recommending putting the links that would be in the menu on a separate page instead?

A Dropbox user using a Dropbox-capable iOS app for the first time has no Dropbox username, only an e-mail address. What would the user put into the username field?

And when the editor happens not to include licensed copies of installable codecs for the framework, watch people blame the publisher of the editor.

It's the server's job if the user doesn't want to have to download an ultra-high-resolution image over a metered connection. It also used to be the server's job back when web browsers insisted on using nearest neighbor resampling instead of bilinear or bicubic resampling.

You appear not to know what it's like to be stuck on the 10 GB per month cap of wireless (satellite or cellular) home Internet access.

But is that 1024 pixels wide with huge distracting white areas on both sides when viewed on a 2560 pixel monitor, or is it 2560 pixels wide with complete inability to see the entire image at once on a 1024 pixel monitor like the one in my laptop?

A tablet held in landscape orientation runs the same operating system as a smartphone held in portrait orientation, despite the latter having only about one-third the horizontal width.

So what should a designer who doesn't want horizontal scrollbars do?

And CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) was supposed to be the instructions that the content formatter follows.

I imagine that as of 2014, most people would not prefer that most web pages look like Barry T. Smith's MFing Web Site. They would consider the default styling that a browser applies to the MFing Web Site to be unprofessional.

How would you prefer that a menu be opened while JavaScript is turned off? To the best of my knowledge, CSS supports only hover-to-show, not click-to-show.

Could you describe what nonstandard "ports and protocols" liveaquaria.com uses? I tried to buy a coral to test what you describe, but it required me to create a username and password before I could check out. Is the need to register before checking out part of the problem you describe? I do know that some manufacturers, such as Games Workshop, have a policy of forbidding online stores from selling their products through a standard shopping cart.

Perhaps the difference comes from limits in CSS. A menu that opens on mouseover works with CSS turned on and JavaScript turned off; a menu that opens on click requires JavaScript.

The Turing completeness disproof is actually related to recurring debates on Slashdot over the definition of phrases like "personal computer" and "general-purpose computer". I say something is a "personal computer" when the person who owns it determines what computing is done on it, and it's not "general-purpose" if specific identifiable purposes are forbidden. This includes a device running Android because of "Unknown sources" and adb install, but not a device running iOS without paying the recurring fee for the developer program. It includes a PC running Windows, OS X, or common GNU/Linux distributions, but not a major video game console.

Sort of. I've been trying to describe the rules of a few different games, and it turned out that Russian roulette and Hi Ho! Cherry-O are in the same family. I made a Russian roulette homebrew game for the NES as a quick-and-dirty test for reading the trigger switch on an NES Zapper. It lets the player pull the trigger to roll a virtual d6 and be eliminated on a roll of 1. The development process inspired me to make a pencil drawing of six figures gambling with a toy gun.

Someone else on the NESdev forum ported an NES emulator for Mac called "Macifom" to iOS so that the developer of an NES homebrew game can sell the game on the App Store by including it with Macifom in an app. My thought process might have been as follows: "Would Russian Roulette in Macifom be rejected? If so, why? What would need to be cut out? And what useful theorems can I prove from this in order to make points on Slashdot about iOS not being for everyone?" I guess the question becomes how much like Russian roulette a game would have to be in order to get rejected for violating Guideline 15.5.