Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Transparency (Score 1) 220

I'm very much not an expert with this stuff, but it seems to me that if a particular strut is going to fail at 10,001lbs and you test it to 10,000lbs, it might pass the test but you still don't want to reuse it. There has to be some cutoff point where you're causing long term damage, but it's still functioning to requirements, right?

Comment Re:Can someone answer me this? (Score 1, Insightful) 164

If you have to manually block people, then you're going to get a lot of fly-by abuse from new accounts that people make to dodge the block lists.

If the system allows users to say "auto-hide all people from my screen who have a 50% troll rating or higher", you're going to get a lot of people abusing the system. It's REALLY, REALLY common on political discussion sites for users to dogpile on people whose opinions they don't like and flag them as trolls, and often they use bots to do it more efficiently.

Comment Re:This legislation brought to you by.. (Score 1) 446

Example of higher-level government bodies overriding lower-level ones... This came up in Washington a while back, and could come up again. Gun possession, or pot possession, whichever you're more fond of. If it's legal in your state, but a small town makes it illegal, then what happens if you have $item in your car and you stop through that town to fuel up? Suddenly you've just broken an unreasonable law for no good reason.

Similarly, if that small town makes it illegal to sell GMOs that aren't labeled with a very specific frowny-face logo...you're going to have a lot of inadvertent lawbreakers. Especially if they say something dumb like "you need to label whether it was grown in a field that has ever grown GMOs", something that might never cross your mind. You can be sure there's a lot of creative lawmakers out there, and you never know what magical categories your product will wind up in!

Comment Re:Meanwhilie is Russia, GMOs are banned - Serious (Score 1) 446

See though, 1) and 2) are actually really damn likely is the problem. Remember how much lower infant mortality rates are in Cuba? It sure as hell isn't because less babies are dying.

That said I'd really love to see an honest study on a national level like that. Just...probably not from Russia.

Comment Re:This legislation brought to you by.. (Score 1) 446

It pains me to say these words that right-wingers say, but patchwork labeling requirements really are bad for small business. If California, Oregon and Washington all have different labeling requirements, then someone who sells to all three needs a fancier supply chain in place to make the packaging. If a small packaged-food company is small enough that it can't secure decades-long contracts with ingredient suppliers (and dictate terms to them), then whether they even have GMOs might change from month to month. Again that screws up the supply chain.

If you want your products to comply with labeling laws, you need to spend a lot of hours (and blow a lot of previously unnecessary labor expenses) to track what the laws are. You have to be more careful what you buy--not because it's healthy, but just because of your labels. You need to redesign labels, maybe frequently as the laws change, and if you're a small company without an in-house designer, that's just more expense.

You're sapping hundreds or thousands of dollars from every single company that sells food, even before people start making decisions about what ingredients to use in the first place. A lot of these margins are LOW. God help them if they get a label slightly wrong and get fined or sued.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull

Working...