Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Easter liability (Score 1) 290

Well - if you have a bit of code where you never should reach a specific point you can add a message there with an unique text string. That could be a form of easter egg, but it will provide a pretty unique message that can be searched for in case something goes wrong - like someone changing one part of the code without realizing the impact on this part of the code.

Many of us have had fun of the "This error shall never occur" and similar messages, some showing up at The Daily WTF.

Comment Re:Streisand Effect! (Score 1) 538

The genie is already out of the box. It won't stop the real terrorists, but it will keep the knowledge off limits for the general public so it may actually take longer to discover a terrorist. If people forget that they should look out for people stashing a ton of fertilizer for their 1/2 acre land we know it's just going to get worse.

Submission + - Is this the death of the Easter egg? (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader writes: BBC reports that more and more companies are cracking down on the practice of hiding harmless snippets of code in their products. Known as "Easter eggs", they can be anything from the names of the developers, to pictures, to games like pinball, to a flight simulator. Is this simply professionalism, or is it stifling programmers' quirky, playful side?

Submission + - Are Bug Bounties the Right Solution for Improving Security? (codinghorror.com)

saccade.com writes: Coding Horror's Jeff Atwood is questioning if the current practice of paying researchers bounties for the software vulnerabilities they find is really improving over-all security. He notes how the Heartbleed bug serves as a counter example to "Linus's Law" that "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow".

...If you want to find bugs in your code, in your website, in your app, you do it the old fashioned way: by paying for them. You buy the eyeballs.

While I applaud any effort to make things more secure, and I completely agree that security is a battle we should be fighting on multiple fronts, both commercial and non-commercial, I am uneasy about some aspects of paying for bugs becoming the new normal. What are we incentivizing, exactly?


Submission + - Announcing HTML 6, the New Version of the Web

Shlomi Fish writes: The World-Wide-Web Consortium (W3C) is excited to announce HTML 6 ("HTML Sicks"), the new version of the Web standards, that will supplant and succeed HTML5, and will feature many new features and innovations. Do you find it exciting as well?

Slashdot Top Deals

For large values of one, one equals two, for small values of two.

Working...