I'm not failing to say anything.
First of all, the only reasons an employer healthcare plan gets cancelled WRT anything to do with the ACA, is 1, they don't meet the minimum standards (which means the plan sucked and its former members need to get themselves onto a plan that doesn't) or that 2, your employer decided to cancel it, in which case, your beef is with your employer. There no even moderately adequate plan, anywhere, that the ACA caused to stop working or otherwise interfered with.
Health care does the best for the most when it is available to all people who are sick and/or injured. Not just for people who make money. If you want diseased people walking the streets without treatment, you're clueless. If you think ER treatment is sufficient to deal with that, you're clueless. If you think ER care is cheaper than proper prophylactic care, you're clueless. If you think forcing sick people to come to work is good for the most important things -- the economy, the other workers, the individual -- you're clueless. If you think people suffering in pain and without adequate treatment is ok if they're not working, you're not only clueless, you're an ass. If you think the government making sure that no one (ok, fewer people... but it's a start) goes without health care is a *bad* idea, then you have failed to rub enough brain cells together to create the required spark of intelligence you need to properly evaluate these issues. So you probably want to rethink this, preferably this time with the facts at hand instead of drooling right wing agitprop.
Now, what has your lack of a job got to do with the ACA, other than the fact that you have more options for healthcare, assuming your state isn't one where the right wingers have destroyed the bottom rung of the ACA by rejecting the medicare expansion?
Yes, the tree of liberty has some very severe problems right now, but the ACA isn't one of them.