> And on the off-chance you're being serious, how do you live day to day in such a black and white world? Just because something doesn't meet my approval doesn't make it immoral by default.
I am being serious. I'm overstating my case for effect but at heart I really mean it. My opinion doesn't matter but I'm entitled to have it and state it. Sure, lots of things don't meet with my approval without me considering them immoral, but some things I *do* consider immoral and the more innocuous seeming they are the more value there is in pointing out what's wrong with them.
The link in my first post is long winded but it does a good job of explaining the issue: Zynga's main revenue derives from the fact it has found a way to hack weaknesses in our built-in brain reward system. It's very consciously and cleverly manipulating people to get them addicted to their games because a few people end up spending $10,000 a year or so on them. There are millions of lesser victims who just end up wasting a vast amount of time doing something that's not even that fun without ever knowing why. They subvert friendships to spread their digital crack in devious ways etc etc. So, this to me is like an article explaining how low level crack dealers have an unpleasant time. I genuinely have more sympathy for crack dealers: they need the money too, their working conditions are nasty, their pay and prospects are terrible ,and their options are far more severely limited than a typical worker at Zynga. Crack is not great for society but society already knows this, there's no point in me to ranting about the evils of crack.