Comment Re:Whom you trust ... ? (Score 1) 120
Exactly. Like, for example, in the title of this article.
Exactly. Like, for example, in the title of this article.
But in the case of the title of this article, "whom" is entirely correct.
Exactly what definition excludes those people from your assertion that "everyone upgraded appropriately"?
That's not necessarily true. People may have "panic upgraded" who were using a supported and up-to-date (and not vulnerable) 0.9.8. People may have "panic upgraded" by building and installing the latest OpenSSL, not knowing that their distribution had pushed out a patched version of the version they had been running. Now, their OpenSSL might be totally outside of package management, and they could really be in trouble for this one, unless they're paying a lot of attention (which they aren't, or they wouldn't have screwed up in the first place).
I hope the percentage of criminals who get caught for bragging is high... Because if for every one of these guys in the article, there's one who can keep his mouth shut, then we may be in trouble.
A "global extinction event" is "highly probable"? And the future is wind and solar?? Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid.
You know what's bad if you have motion sickness?
Watching a video of a guy on a roller coaster watching a video of being on a roller coaster.
FoxBleed is one. It doesn't block the connection, but it lets you know about the problem.
You should be fired.
It's an F-350. It's tornado-proof.
Anything that advances the anthropogenic global warming agenda is climate. Anything that doesn't is weather. Keep up!
Would you care to read the summary and try again?
That's one of the most well-articulated statements as to why Bennett's posts are worthless. Thanks!
I feel I should point out I was being ironic in my original post. In the comments for previous essays by Bennett, he has attempted to defend himself by challenging everyone to find any incorrect statement. Of course the lack of incorrectness is ludicrously insufficient to justify his posts, as you point out.
Can you find any statement that is incorrect?
Trap full -- please empty.
