Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Uncomfortable Relationship (Score 1) 250

I think part of the problem is the hierarchical federal bureaucracy, where a few predators up in the higher levels, use fear, uncertainty, and doubt to put those at the lower levels into a "OMG, we have to DO SOMETHING" mentality. The normally rational actors quickly fall into the herd mentality and carry out tasks of the predators. I love the sig that says, "a person can be smart, people are stupid", this is especially true when FUD is used to paint the picture of the unknown, be it muslim, computer hacker, pot smoker, etc.

Comment Re:Really (Score 1) 229

I personally couldn't stand it when we had granite counter tops. Dish or plate hits it just a little too hard? If you are lucky, it only chips, if not, get the broom out. We must have lost 1-2 pint beer glasses a month.

You? Feel free to to put in whatever type of counters you want.

Comment Re:oh the horror! (Score 1) 128

As there is no labeling of GMO foods in the US, how would you suggest I avoid them?

I wasn't thinking you were nutty enough to reject all GMOs, but simply the ones you don't think "taste good". Anyway, while there is no mandatory GMO labeling, but you can certainly find GMO-free foods.

How am I supposed to differentiate between GM and non-GM foods? They aren't labeled, so I can't make a decision based on how they taste. I reject them because I am concerned about the lack of tests on the short and long term affects they have on my body, the environment, and the crops around them. If you want to eat it, go ahead, I'm not here to convince you what to do, I'm just asking that I have the information available to make an informed choice.

If it isn't fresh meat or produce, I have to assume some part is GM.

Yes, you do. And no amount of labeling would change that.

huhwhat? Mandatory labeling of GM ingredients in packaged food would do EXACTLY that.

On the large scale, This doesn't seem to be a realistic way to have a stable, sustainable food supply.

Sustainability is some expression of middle class angst, not a realistic goal. Life and biology is constant change and adaptation.

I'm not using sustainable in the environmentalist, you-shouldnt-hurt-the-mother-earth sense. I'm talking about the ability to grow crops without requiring a high-tech herbicide and pesticide regimen being needed just to bring a crop to harvest when fighting against the resistant breeds of pests and weeds we are indirectly breeding.

If we have to keep upping the pesticide resistance

We don't have to "up" anything, we just periodically have to change pesticides and herbicides.

How many different pesticides and herbicides do you think are out there to discover? Can you imagine the point where it becomes too time consuming and expensive to find that next new thing? Drug companies are running into a similar problem, why do you not believe there are limits in pesticides and herbicides?

Comment Re:oh the horror! (Score 1) 128

You're free not to buy their stuff if you don't like it.

As there is no labeling of GMO foods in the US, how would you suggest I avoid them?

I can and do buy fruits and vegatables from local farmers. I can and do buy locally produced meat as well.

If it's at the grocery store, I have to hope that the store is labeling their meat and produce correctly. If it isn't fresh meat or produce, I have to assume some part is GM.

you need to keep developing new GMOs regularly in order to keep benefiting from them.

On the large scale, This doesn't seem to be a realistic way to have a stable, sustainable food supply. If we have to keep upping the pesticide resistance, and then raising pesticide use in an ever escalating battle against more and more resistant bugs and weeds, where does that lead? More and more pesticide runoff in the water. More pollinators dying from the ever increasing levels of pesticide.

Comment Re:Fuck you, MS (Score 1) 379

The only thing that MS can do is specify that all games are leases (which require) you to agree to a EULA.

Great. Maybe we can then get more court cases questioning the validity of EULAs.

In the US, minors cannot enter into a contract, which brings up some other questions.

Will XB1 game sales be limited to adults with proper ID?

What happens if an XB1 game is given to a minor? Or the adult that purchased the game has a minor press the "I agree" button when the EULA is presented on screen? A minor cannot legally agree to, and be bound to the terms of, a EULA.

Will an adult have to sign a contract when a game is purchased? How does that work when making an online purchase?

Comment Re:How do they remove anonimity? (Score 1) 158

Silk Road run a mixing service?

I believe they have an internal bitcoin mixing service. See here, "Bitcoin wallet that mixes all incoming and outgoing coins so as to obscure their origin".

Or here "Silk Road has a built in coin mixer. When you add coins to your account, they are sent through a bunch of dummy transactions, split up and recombined with the coins of other people."

There is likely more detailed info on the SR forums.

Comment Re:Cody Wilson can go fuck himself (Score 1) 625

he's afraid of his rights being taken away

I don't see your suggestion of some other way for him to defend himself.

in violation of the law.

[citation needed]

Nevermind, I gotcha here. The United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives doesn't agree with you.

Q: Does the GCA prohibit anyone from making a handgun, shotgun or rifle?

With certain exceptions a firearm may be made by a non-licensee provided it is not for sale and the maker is not prohibited from possessing firearms. However, a person is prohibited from assembling a non-sporting semi-automatic rifle or non-sporting shotgun from imported parts. In addition, the making of an NFA firearm requires a tax payment and approval by ATF. An application to make a machine gun will not be approved unless documentation is submitted showing that the firearm is being made for a Federal or State agency.

[18 U.S.C. 922(o) and (r), 26 U.S.C. 5822, 27 CFR 478.39, 479.62 and 479.105]

My emphasis added. NFA would be the National Firearms Act, and it applies to machine guns, machine gun parts, short barreled shotguns/rifles, silencers, etc. It doesn't apply to your standard handgun, rifle, or shotgun.

When the 3D printer was invented people envisioned a technology that could help, that could make development rapid, that would improve our lives. Now Mr. Wilson has ruined all that and made it a tool to create weapons.

I don't understand how his use of some tool changes your ability to use your own similar tool for some other use. Sure, go ahead and tell me about how 3D printers are going to be outlawed, it's been a busy morning and I need a laugh.

Comment Re:Hypocrisy (Score 1) 893

Do the companies they own and profit from,

Not really. They pay a lot of money and they just don't get that much in return. That was the original poster's point. Basic services are a monopolized protection racket.

While I understand that fraud and corruption in regards to public utilities are a problem, that's not what I'm talking about here. If some office or store didn't exist, then there would be less car traffic of customers and employees. There would be less need for other infrastructure that is only required because of the increased demand caused by the commerce. This commerce then financially enriches the capitalist. I don't have a problem with charging capitalists for the infrastructure that is used in their commercial ventures.

Having hidden, tax sheltered accounts is another way to increase the return on their capital. If it wasn't saving more than it cost, it wouldn't be happening. The natue of a capitalist is that they must keep getting "much in return", if not, they have to either change in some way or they become former capitalists.

What is worth rich peoples' money is the minting of favorable law, regulation, and selective contracts which creates all sort of profitable rent seeking opportunities. But I think you probably wouldn't want rich peoples' tax money paying for that.

Use of those tactics in no way excludes the use of others. Buying lawyers, lobbyists, regulations, and contracts are just expenses with expected paybacks. Decreasing costs (lowering tax obligations, decreasing benefit and salary) and increasing revenue by buying favorable treatment, both increase the bottom line.

Slashdot Top Deals

Love makes the world go 'round, with a little help from intrinsic angular momentum.

Working...