Comment Re:Obligatory... (Score 1, Insightful) 159
So what happens when the next big social media app (from perhaps India) this time becomes popular? Do you repeat the same process?
So what happens when the next big social media app (from perhaps India) this time becomes popular? Do you repeat the same process?
Except that wasn't an example of overreach. Seasonal wetlands are still wetlands. Polluting them still affects both aquifers and the migratory waterfowl which use them.
Got any actual examples, not just more shitting on everything you don't care about, like other people?
Nobody with a brain believes in that shit anyway. How many examples do you want of the government shutting down businesses on bullshit pretexts? Or propping them up?
"TikTok owner ByteDance would prefer shutting down its loss-making app rather than sell it"
Yes, that's because its purpose is not profit, as it's a PsyOp. If the goal were profit, they would prefer to sell it. If they sell it, there is a risk that documents which prove its purpose will be transferred, and blow the whole operation even worse than being shut down.
"It's probably because you're asserting that the mod down process validates your "facts"."
If you want to claim what I'm saying isn't factual, the onus is on you to provide some counter evidence, or at minimum, counter arguments. When people mod down an opinion because they don't agree with it they have surrendered the point.
Now let's see the court enforce it.
Where does it state anything will be shutdown? This about cleaning up their act which might cut into the constant record quarterly profits.
The lawsuits against the EPA haven't been to destroy or remove it...BUT, to curtail the overreach by the EPA and other Executive offices have been guilty of in the past couple decades especially.
Can you cite some examples of overreach besides vague recollections?
Wait until simply reading about abortion is made illegal. https://www.vanityfair.com/new...
I'm picturing Willy Wonka saying sarcastically "Stop, don't".
Republicans also controlled the senate at the time.
Indeed. QEMM was something of a hero in that department, but even memmaker was enormously helpful...
Every major shift WAS different from the one before.
What's DOUBLY different about this time is that this time we are not moving from skill to skill, we are moving from unskilled to something.
I truly despise the idea that there are no unskilled jobs because it is not just false, it's a counterproductive argument. All of us who have worked a variety of jobs know that some jobs require both talent and education, and others require mostly just a pulse and respiration. But people who work both kinds of jobs have essentially the same needs.
Which word did you find unclear? I don't remember stuttering.
It all went to shit in 1960. Been shit ever since.
What else happened in 1960?
Quite a bit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Can you be more specific?
Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.