Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment A word about luddism (Score 1) 674

Luddites (contrary to more recent neo-luddites) was not an anti-technology group. They were depicted this way by their political enemies but actually they only protested to the way many workers were fired and obsoleted without any kind of safety net. There has been some machines destruction, but their revendications were social, not technological.

Comment Re:Using it wrong (Score 2) 625

The problem is that the jobs and the resources are all allocated wrong. We could (at least in America) have 20-30 hour work weeks, plenty of family time, decent pay, and a low unemployment rate.. if a certain select few did not make ALL the money and take control of ALL the resources.

Hear, hear! Before dismissing it as partisan politics and easy wealthy-bashing, think about it for a second: generalized automation means that there won't be enough work for everyone. It either means unemployement for most people or it means shorter work weeks. Free market does not care to choose between these two alternative, the choice will only come from politics and from rules we make.

the US Government fucks up everything it touches

This is really a problem that US citizens need to solve quickly. Free market and automation won't lead to a techno-utopia without putting a brake on the concentration of capital. Automated industries are capital-biased instead of labor-biased (your output depends more on the amount of funds you can invest rather than on the labor you manage to hire) and therefore will worsen inequalities.

For example, the NSA said it will fire 90% of sysadmins and replace them with automation. Anyone in IT knows that idea is 100% stupid.

To be fair, I am not sure it would have been a worse idea than outsourcing it to private companies filled with people like Snowden who were not considered trustworthy enough to work in the NSA...

Comment Re:Ain't that a surprise.. not.. (Score 2) 98

Understanding the system, using it, subverting it, is totally fine. But some people will always confuse "having a use for something" with "loving this system".

IP laws are despicable, costly to mankind, dangerous for research and harmful for the economy. I am still making business plans that rely on these bad rules of the game, just like I would include corruption in my plans if it was unavoidable in my country.

Yes, rethinking copyright laws would force us to rethink all the open source licences. We would do that happily. Software patents can disappear overnight, OSS would not break a sweat over that. And trademarks are currently the less problematic aspect of IP laws.

Comment Re:a few hours for one key would be good (Score 1) 236

Ok, I am sick of people missing the point totally. This is not about saying "oh! nasty US! we should team up with Russia instead!". This is not about saying how easy or hard it is to break into a company's network

This is about TOR, this is about what TOR is supposed to be and this is about why it is unacceptable that the NSA can break a key in a few hours.

You are totally free to not care about security, but understand that in many fields, this mean lost contracts and millions wasted.In all IT wompanies where I had admin rights, and I did this job as a side attribution, a few hours a week, none of the tricks you proposed would have worked : network was switched, passwords encryted, local machines not trusted, printer maintenance was made internally, crucial technical information was not accessible by non tech-savvy people, and in two of them, offices were locked during lunch breaks. Basic security is easy and cheap, and some people do it well. Some of us take security seriously, and TOR is a tool that should be trustable in such a context. It is generally and, honestly, we were aware that it was probably not 100% NSA-resistant, but it aims at being, and in that context, this problem is a big problem.

Slashdot Top Deals

The sooner all the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find their money. - Ed Bluestone

Working...