Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Announcements

Journal Journal: Bicycle Commuting: Day 1

Asside from finding a broken shower pipe that is flooding my walls last night which made me stay up till 4am poking around in the wall and fretting like crazy and making me shift my shedule back by 4 hours.....

I actually made my first bike commute to work. Of course it was at 11:30am and not 7am when it should be.

Weather:
It was windy (34 mph with gusts up to 45MPH ). Dammmm windy. Dangerous actually. But the temp was plesant (60s) and there was no precipitation.

Road Conditions:
Construction. The main road I drive (no bike) to head to work is under construction. That means lots of patched up road and that is not good for road bike tires / rims. I'll either have to take a full lane when riding there, or go somewhere else because there is no shoulder.

Traffic:
Light. Only one major stop light to wait at along with a dozen or so vehicles.

Physical Conditioning:
Sucking. Hard. And. Long. Of course I was fighting a bad wind, biking with ~20lbs of crap on the back, and for the second time in several years. But I still got elevated heart rate and broke a sweat (not like that is hard to do). Forgot to wear my gloves so hands were sore.

Over All Impression:
I'm a wimp. Driving is easier. More money would change this situation (ie not have to scrimp on the funds) but would probably just make me worry about money more. The more you have the more you have to loose.

Now if only I could get PAID to do this or get paid while doing this.....

1) Buy Bike
2) Sell Car
3) ???
4) PROFIT!

User Journal

Journal Journal: Thanks for the Weather Update Stan, Now on to the Top Story 3

So we had some lucky guesses, some close guesses, and a nearly correct guess (except he was greedy and tried two answers in one).

Purchasing a bicycle is nothing ground shaking. What is, is that I will be selling my car (sniff sniff.... I love that car!) and moving my family to a one car household, and my wife keeps her car.

There are many reasons NOT to give up our current a 1:1 ratio of cars to people:

1) two different jobs
2) living in a large geographical area that is not bicycle friendly
3) second job requiring on site visits in my off hours time
4) the "late for work rush"
5) convenience
6) summer heat (Boise gets to 100+/- 5deg and stays there for weeks) that car is old style freon and works stronger than ANY vehicle I have ever been in. We recharged it the month before the ban in the US.
7) safety - bikes by themselves may be safe but any bicycle / motorcycle vs SUV crash is one sided)
8) spur of the moment errands
9) capacity.... few cars (excluding trucks here) have the capacity of an 88 LeSabre for being able to haul lots of stuff or people or both all while hitting 20MPG in city traffic.

But there are also many reasons to get rid of the second vehicle. Here are some:
1) Money - Car insurance - additional $200-300 every year.
2) Logistics - Low mile commute (less than 2 miles)
3) Money - Gas - $320 / year (again for a very low mileage commute) (~$80 / wuarter)
4) Health - Forced exercise (more on this in later journal)
5) Money - Car Repairs - at least $150-200 / year in bits and pieces averaged over time.
6) Logistics - Flat terrain (no hills between work & home)
7) Money - Vehicle Registration & Fees - ~$100 / yr in registration & emissions test
8) Sex appeal - ok..... so bike shorts don't quite count
9) Tradition - My wife's dad has ridden a bike to work for decades (of course he has worked at the same business for decades where as I have had 3 jobs in the last year, and 9 jobs in the last decade)
10) Social - Road Biking with the brother-in-law & pastor. Should be loads of fun.

Yes I mentioned money a lot. That is because money is a big concern. Especially when our mortgage is 40% of after-tax income and my per hour income after health care (bought on the open market through a PPO) is $13 / hr (excluding any actual spending on health care).

So of course I made a spreadsheet. It is costing me about $1.85 every day to fuel, repair, register, license, and insure my vehicle (an `88 LeSabre). This cost does not include the cost for my wife's car. This is just my costs (I even can tell who's credit card receipt for gas it is because she goes to Chevron and I go to Fred Meyer).

A bicycle has far more limited re-occurring costs. If I blow a tire tube every quarter $10 (not that crazy of an expectation) and buy gear every once and a while ($30 / quarter and that is a big expense account for just commuting and occasional road biking) I'll have a pretty realistic expectation lined up. After one year my expenses with a bike would be $1,130. Car would be $465.32. After two years the expense is $1,290 for the bike and $1,115 for the car. After three years the cost is $1,450 for the bike and $1,765 for the car.

So after 3 years, including startup expenses and assuming no major problems with the car then I will be ahead by switching to the bike. And assuming no major problems for the car is quite an assumption.

To that end, I bought a road bicycle yesterday. Visit the pictures section of my Multiply to see the rig. I bought a clearance bike at Bob's Bicycles Boise (Google to find it) that was initially ~$950 and has carbon fiber front fork and seat post. Nice shifters and lots of gears. Then I added on a rear rack to hold my change of clothes, a rack bag with side bags (and the metal frame to hold the side bags), a helmet (might return it cause I found my old one), pants (yes they are padded biking pants), a pump, and padded gloves (a must).

So in 3 weeks I'll be flushing my cars brakes (needed this for a while) checking lots of fluids and then putting it up for sale. Pretty much any income from the sale will push forward my break even deadline.

So there you have it. Not an insignificant change. Hopefully a change for the better financially and health wise. Now if only I could be paid to have made this change (more on this later).

User Journal

Journal Journal: Allergies: What's Left Won't Kill Me (Not A Guarentee) 3

If I remember way back, I had a bad bout of allergy problems that started all of a sudden. Well I haven't talked about them, but the allergies still are there. In October, after blood testing results, I eliminated all wheat products from my diet. This hurts. I LIKE bread. I LIKE pasta. I LOVE rolls with lots of butter. I LOVE gravy smothering a good stew or mashed potatoes.

But in the interested if being able to open my eyes and not scratch my skin off entirely, I eliminated all wheat from foods I ate. But the problems remained. Random bouts of eyes swelling shut. Constant itching. Constant eczema on the order of the "medium" case pictured at the Wikipedia link.

So two weeks ago my wife and I re-read through the blood work to find some of the other allergens and exactly how intense each reaction was. It turns out that wheat was near the bottom and I had far worse reactions to two other very common substances. Eggs where the worst, followed by milk and then wheat.

So we took the all encompassing step of eliminating all of those foods from my diet. Nothing with eggs, milk, or wheat. Try eating out anywhere with those allergies. Even the gluten free menus at the larger chain restaurants won't help you there. Only the big ones seem to have caught on to the portion of the population that has such unnecessarily strict dietary requirements.

Of all the foods I will miss..... of all the foods I ate with reckless abandon..... of all the foods I combined with any other food as often as possible.... of all the foods that delighted my taste buds..... I will miss cheese the most.

What an amazing food. So much variety. So much nutrition. So many flavors. Exotic Greek feta. Soft Havarti. Crisp mozzarella. Spicy blended pepper jack. Smooth cream cheese. Tasty cottage cheese.

I will miss putting cheese on salads, chips, potatoes, sandwiches, bagels, crackers, burritos, and on and on. I used to go through a 32 oz baby loaf of cheese in just two weeks. R.I.P. poor cheese slicer. To the back of the kitchen implements drawer you go. May be one day science will find a way to provide my body with the ability to digest and enjoy the many flavours of cheese.

Jason

Businesses

Journal Journal: Ethanol Fuel: Unlikely Foes 5

I have been studying the ethanol production process for quite a while because it is the subject of my first feature length / made for TV production. So naturally when I ran across a Slashdot Frontpage article about EtOH I was interested. Get the article from the source.

This is market economics at work. Here is the gist: The Fed takes our money in the form of taxes, and then gives out some of that money as subsidies to foster behavior / activities it wants to see. By it, I mean the massive government bureaucracy. Part of the problem with EtOH production is that the raw products needed are being taken from other production flows to satisfy this new demand. Nothing unusual there. The down side comes in that by offering the subsidies for a specific product, the government is effectively raising the cost of production for all other industries that need the same materials by not also providing them with free money. Very interesting in deed. Am I in favor of the subsidies? I don't know yet. I stand to profit from the growing EtOH trend through the production of my informative product (which isn't just a How-To but also include blueprints, part lists, yield calculators, and loads of other resources) but there are some issues with the industry. Give it a read.

Jason

Education

Journal Journal: Read This To Feel Real, Real Stupid (I did) 3

From the front page of Slashdot.org

So remember that kind in high school that got all A's, went to Interlochen, and was on the chess team? Well he or she might also be the one that showed that in many cases it [Loop homology] is isomorphic to the Hochschild cohomology of the fundamental group, or who built their own mass spectrograph.

Reading through this list of the top winners is like reading through the unfortunately long list of toddlers that can kick your ass in a fist fight. That is to say, it is depressing. Wow.

Jason

Editorial

Journal Journal: Idaho's Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter

Reason has a good article on C.L. "Butch" Otter, Idaho's mostly Libertarian, but still somewhat Republican governor who was elected this fall. In reading more about him, I find that his politics match fairly close with my own, except on a few social issues (but those are the same social issues I hold that contrast with most Libertarians).

The article provides a quick biography and personal history, including the infamous "tight jeans contest" and party that led to his DUI conviction.

Worth a read for anyone interested in learning about one of the more libertarian states in the Union.

User Journal

Journal Journal: DC Gun Ban Overturned: Commentary 4

Linked from here is an article in Reason Online talking about the basis for the recent federal appeals court reversal of the Washington D.C. gun ban.

I'll summarize a few points. Do I personally have the freedom to say what I want, ie freedom of speech? Yes. And what grants me that right? The US Constitution Amendment 1, says "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech" (first clause omitted because it is the freedom of religion clause). This gives me an individual right to the freedom of speech based on my inclusion into the group of all citizens that this applies to. Numerous case law has established this. I also have a personal freedom of religion, and the freedom to practice such, and I have that freedom as a result of my inclusion in the group of all citizens that this is granted to.

And so it follows for each and every amendment. The personal rights are granted as well as the group rights. What then gives gun ban proponents the indication that when the 2nd Amendment says "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." that it applies differently? That Amendment DOES provide supporting evidence for this clause when it says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," but that has not nullified the right granted in the second part.

If you have the time, the article is worth a quick read.

User Journal

Journal Journal: New Program Says I'm a Heretic 7

EDIT: BBC != Ch4. Fixed.

I bring you (via this alert reader) a very compelling piece of journalism & film by Channel 4 in the UK. The program interviews a lot of top scientists and draws some pretty scary conclusions. If you watched An Inconvenient Truth then you will will enjoy this presentation, but go there with an open mind because fundamental assumptions will be challenged. Just cozy up some time and watch it here or at the same reference in the above article.

I'll avoid any discussion in this journal because I don't want to taint any opinions before watching this film.

Jason

Media

Journal Journal: Al Gore's Un-Green House: 20x Energy of National Average 12

Did you know that according to the Tennessee Center (which dug up some utility records) Al Gore's personal mansion consumes 20 times the energy of the average American home, which according to Al Gore's own numbers, consumes more on average than other homes in the world. According to the article, "The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh--more than 20 times the national average. Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh--guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore's average monthly electric bill topped $1,359." That is $29,268 a year for those of you at home with out calculators.

So I did some searching, looking up the Davidson County Assessors office, looking up a certain owner named Albert Gore Jr, and noticed his parcel. I won't provide any direct links to any of those sites, but any reasonably smart monkey and Google can find the address and look up the property information. That "house" by the way, is a 10,010 ft^2 (finished, the unfinished area is 13,461 ft^2) mansion built in 1914.

This property contains 2.09 Acres of land mainly classified as RES with a(n) RY SING FAM style building, built about 1915 , having FRAME exterior and ASPHALT roof cover, with 1 unit(s), 20 total room(s), 5 total bedroom(s), 8 total bath(s), 2 total half bath(s), 0 total 3/4 bath(s). The Building Value $2,124,400; Land Value $897,000, and a Total Value $3,021,400

So Mr. The-Earth-Is-Burning-Up is running around complaining about MY energy use while consuming 20 times the average home AND while flying in a private jetliner and being driven to the airport in a motorcade of SUVs. I just did a quick look at my gas and electric bills. My gas usage for last month (the coldest of the month) was 78 therms, costing me $103. My electricity usage in August (most use of the air conditioner) is around $120 (cannot remember the amount of Kw used) but tapers off to $30 in the fall/winter/spring months.

My electric utilities are about as "green" as Gore's (80% of Idaho's power is generated from Hydro, probably near the same for Tenn. because of the extensive TVA system) and I run a total yearly utility cost of around $900 (rounded UP to nearest hundred dollars) which compared to Gore's yearly gas / electricity bill of $29,200 (rounded DOWN to nearest hundred dollars), I run a very green 3.08% of his home energy consumption.

To be fare, he has a (finished) 10,010 ft^2 nearly 100 year old mansion and I have a 15 year old 1250 ft^2 (finished) starter home (with a cheap 60% efficient forced air gas heater) (and brand new door seals I just put in) in the 'burbs. Lets look at consumption based on a per square foot basis to compare apples to apples. My home costs $0.72 per ft^2 per year to run and his costs $2.91 per ft^2 per year. That still means that Al Gore consumes 404% per ft^2 compared to me (or I consume 25% compared to him).

So don't try to scold me for being ecologically damaging. Despite the economic fallacy of recycling, I still do recycle most of the feasible items. Despite living in the suburbs I still carpool when possible and live =2 miles from my work. Despite being a white, male, socially conservative, economically libertarian, practicing big game hunter, evangelical Christian, and everything else Greenpeace / PETA / etc stand against... I am doing my part to live an ecologically sustainable lifestyle and bucking their stereotypes.

In fact, stay tuned to this journal / blog for news of two video productions I have in pre-production both about ecologically sound and (more importantly) economically sound

User Journal

Journal Journal: Jumping Ship to Multiply 12

So if you haven't heard enough about multiply, then look it up (no links necessary). I'm over there as are a bunch of others from the journal crowd here at slashdot. the main features that I like: invite only "groups" and it can aggregate journals from blogger, Livejournal, and others. So far it looks robust enough and doesn't seem to be annoying, except the emails for every message you have (couldn't they batch that? or just provide an on-site in-box?).

no more double posting. All I have to do is post in LJ, and multiply gets it (unless I include a special <-- multiply --> tag.

Check LJ under this same user name or hit up multiply. Not everything on LJ will be on multiply because I have real space friend on LJ and we talk there too. I'm probably not going to be around here much. have fun ya'll.

jason

Slashback

Journal Journal: Firehose Suddenly Visible To My Account? 6

So I'm looking at slashdot and suddenly I see a link for this "FireHose" thing which I thought was a subscriber feature. What the heck is it and how did it suddenly show up? Is this a new feature pushed out from subscribers to the unwashed masses? Or did someone send me a subscription with out me noticing it?

Any ideas?

By the way, this will likely be another "Journal Friday" where Jason posts a lot of catch up journals, as well as fixing hte number problems from the Volcano SO2 emission story the other day.

jason

Enlightenment

Journal Journal: Car SO2 Emissions vs Volcanoes - Al Gore vs Facts 7

EDIT: entire article content yanked due to some math flaws and CO2 vs SO2 number problems. I'm going to recalculate and repost when I can find the corrected data. Sorry for the confusion and stay tuned

The Media

Journal Journal: The "Support the Troops But Not The Mission" Bullshit 7

Thanks to this journal regarding this bit of reporting by NBC regarding soldiers opinions on the "We support you but not the mission" fad with the some of the anti-war crowd.

I suppose those individuals taking this stance haven't ever been in a situation where people revile you while professing to support you. Police work is one of those professions. No one wants to see an Officer. They hate Officers. Unless their sorry ass is in trouble or got ripped off, etc. Then they can't say enough about Law Enforcement. Too slow. Out chasing speeders instead of catching the "real criminals" (who are also speeders you dip-sticks). Never around when you need them. Paid too much to do too little.

Tell you what. I'll put a set of clothes on you that makes you look like the KKK, and then I'll put you in LA. Now go do your job of (anything really: how about side walk vender) with out getting your ass shot. Now you get paid just $20 / hr but you have good medical benefits. Is it worth it?

Ok. Now put on some camo, go to Iraq, and try to get to century old enemies to quit blowing the hell out of each other. Now have dozens of "important" senators and reps deride what you do while supposedly paying lip service to you. You cannot separate the person from the job when the job is soo closely linked to the very survival of the person. The job becomes the person, for better or worse.

jason

User Journal

Journal Journal: Skeptic Revamps $1M Psychic Prize 11

Amusing and interesting all in one! Go read the article at the source but if you don't want to give Wired any page hits (or are lazy), I'll quote it below. The gist is that a magician, a practicer of slight of hand not the paranormal, got fed up with psychics and their tricks and ploys bilking the unsuspecting public so he offered up a cash prize to anyone that can prove their claim of supernatural abilities.

The result? The crazies come out of the shadows. Guys that think they can teleport things randomly. Guys that claim to be able to transmit their thoughts to a receiving party. You guessed it. Good 'ol fashioned crazy folk. But that wasn't his target. He wants to take on the big money mediums that talk to the dead, bend spoons, etc. The pot got bigger, topping 1 million bigger, thanks to an anonymous donor.

He has a staff of people just to deal with the crazy people trying to get the money, or trying to be reaffirmed that their diagnosable disorder is real and not just them being nuts (one lady claimed to not be human because of the secret service...... wtf?).

Favorite lines from the article...

  • If you're an undiscovered psychic, soothsayer, dowser or medium, time may be running out for you to put your supernatural powers to the test and claim a million dollar prize. But you already knew that, didn't you?
  • A Nevada man legally named "The Prophet Yahweh" planned to seize the prize for charity by summoning two spaceships to a Las Vegas park last year, but negotiations broke down when he announced he was bringing several armed guards to the demonstration
  • the foundation has to deal with the thorny dilemma of where to draw the line between upholding its commitment, and potentially exploiting or feeding someone's mental illness
  • Using resources freed up by dropping unknown and mentally ill applicants, Randi hopes to make things uncomfortable for his real prey: the high-profile psychics who make their living off a credulous public, and who so far won't touch the Million Dollar Challenge with a 10-foot dowsing rod.

Do I believe in such things? Surprisingly the answer is a resounding.... maybe. Ancient Egypt's priests turned their own staffs into snakes (too bad they were eaten by Moses' staff-turned-snake) and I believe there are demons on earth. I have no problem believing that these same demons would love to trick a person into serving them / Satan just so the person could have a nifty trick to do for friends, etc. Do I think any of these are from angels / God? No. Why? Because God has all of creation as witness to his powers and he needs a cheap parlor trick like he needs another person shouting "God hates fags."

By Kevin Poulsen| Also by this reporter
02:00 AM Jan, 12, 2007

If you're an undiscovered psychic, soothsayer, dowser or medium, time may be running out for you to put your supernatural powers to the test and claim a million dollar prize.

But you already knew that, didn't you?

Ten years after stage magician and avowed skeptic James Randi first offered a seven-figure payday to anyone capable of demonstrating paranormal phenomenon under scientific scrutiny, the 79-year-old clear-eyed curmudgeon is revising the rules of his nonprofit foundation's Million Dollar Challenge to better target high-profile charlatans, and spend less time on unknown psychics, who too often turn out to be delusional instead of deceptive.

"We can't waste the hundreds of hours that we spend every year on the nutcases out there -- people who say they can fly by flapping their arms," says Randi. "We have three file drawers jam-packed with those collections.... There are over 300 claims that we have handled in detail."

A skeptic since his teen years, Randi launched his challenge in 1964, after growing outraged with fake mediums and fortunetellers using simple conjurers' tricks to prey on the public. A challenge was an efficient alternative to trying to prove a negative: Instead of traveling the world investigating and debunking miracle workers one-by-one, an unclaimed cash prize stands as a fact on the ground -- an immovable obstacle around which anyone purporting supernatural powers must eventually navigate.

The challenge started small. Randi initially offered $1,000 of his own money to anyone who could read a mind or bend a spoon under controlled conditions. He later upped the ante to $10,000, but still didn't get a lot of takers. "There wasn't much interest in $10,000, and frankly I couldn't afford more than that," he says.

Then in 1996, an unnamed donor contributed a million dollars to the cause. Today the James Randi Education Foundation has an office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and a small staff to keep pace with a steady stream of applicants, all supported by member contributions, grants and the interest off the million bucks, which remains unclaimed.

Currently, claiming the money takes a few steps: An initiate first has to submit a notarized application, agree with the foundation on a test protocol, then pass a preliminary test administered by independent local investigators. Should the would-be psychic pass the first test, under the agreed-upon rules, all that remains is to repeat his or her success in front of Randi -- then, poof, a psychic millionaire is born.

In 10 years, though, nobody's passed the preliminary exam. The most recent one was administered in Stockholm in October, when Swedish medium Carina Landin tried to identify the gender of the authors of 20 diaries by touching the covers. She got 12 right; 16 was the agreed-upon threshold for success. (The foundation plans to re-administer Landin's test following revelations that several of the diaries were older than stipulated in the protocol.)

Before that, the last preliminary test was in July 2005, when a Hawaiian psychic named Achau Nguyen traveled to Los Angeles to demonstrate he could mentally transmit his thoughts to a friend in another room. Under the watchful eyes of paranormal investigators, a video camera and a small audience, Nguyen selected 20 index cards from a deck of 30 and focused on the words written on each of them in turn -- while one floor below his "receiver" wrote down the wrong word, 20 out of 20 times.

These tests, however unsuccessful, represent the cream of the crop for the Million Dollar Challenge -- polite, sincere applicants able to agree to a reasonable testing protocol. The vast majority of the people applying for the money don't get that far.

A Nevada man legally named "The Prophet Yahweh" planned to seize the prize for charity by summoning two spaceships to a Las Vegas park last year, but negotiations broke down when he announced he was bringing several armed guards to the demonstration in case any "negative personalities" showed up. An inventor who claimed to have built a device that could sense the psychic distress of an egg about to be dropped into a pot of boiling water recently abandoned his application when the foundation suggested the egg be threatened by a hammer instead, in case the invention was really just detecting steam.

"One a week gets as far as a protocol negotiation, and then drops off," says Jeff Wagg, who administers the challenge.

Those are the easy ones. In some of the applications, perhaps most of them, the foundation has to deal with the thorny dilemma of where to draw the line between upholding its commitment, and potentially exploiting or feeding someone's mental illness. The demarcation is inherently tricky, since the entire theatre of paranormal testing is located in the realm of extra-rational belief.

A San Francisco woman, for example, was determined to prove that she wasn't human. She had trouble articulating why she believed that, but somehow the Secret Service was involved. In a more recent application, a New York state man claimed that he could summon the appearance of small objects while walking down a road. "The results are plain to see and obviously appear by themselves, in various random arrangements," he wrote the foundation. "I will these phenomenon into being, and/or they happen because of my physical presence alone, therefore I claim to have these powers."

What a psychiatrist might interpret as a warning sign for schizophrenia, the James Randi Educational Foundation is obliged to take seriously. After all, who's to say that random objects teleporting into existence is any more unlikely than Uri Geller telekinetically bending a spoon? But at some point, the process becomes distasteful.

"If we get them to go to a challenge and they lose, we're exposing someone who had serious mental illness," says Wagg. "That doesn't do us any good, and it doesn't do them any good. It doesn't prove anything."

Culling these applications from the process is a major goal of the revamped rules, which take effect April 1st.

Starting then, the challenge will be closed to undiscovered psychic talent; to submit an application, the aspirant will have to demonstrate a "media profile" -- television reports, newspaper articles or a reference in a book that chronicles his or her extraordinary abilities.

"We're not going to deal with unknown people who have silly claims," says Wagg. "Let's say, somebody claims they can walk on water. We'll say, prove it to somebody else first. Get on the local news. Then bring it to us."

The applicant has to back up those press clippings with validation from the hallowed halls of academia. "They have to get some academic to endorse their claims," says Randi. "And that academic is not the local chiropractor or some such thing." The academic also has to stand behind the endorsement when contacted by the skeptics.

With the new criteria in place, the foundation will, at its option, dispense with the preliminary test and move right to the money game.

Using resources freed up by dropping unknown and mentally ill applicants, Randi hopes to make things uncomfortable for his real prey: the high-profile psychics who make their living off a credulous public, and who so far won't touch the Million Dollar Challenge with a 10-foot dowsing rod.

Randi says he'll start actively investigating professional mind-readers and mediums for proof of criminal fraud, or opportunities for civil lawsuits. Like Elliot Ness stalking Al Capone, he's not above busting a psychic for tangential infractions like tax code violations or an SEC matter.

At the same time, the foundation will choose six to eight high-profile targets each year, meticulously outline their claims, and then call them out one-by-one.

"We're going to pick people every year and hammer on them," says Wagg. "We're going to send certified mail, we're going to do advertising. We're going to pick a few people and say, we are actively challenging you. We may advertise in The New York Times. This will make the challenge a better tool, to be what it is supposed to be."

The foundation will launch this public-shaming initiative with a list of four targets, including self-proclaimed medium John Edward, and daytime talk show darling Sylvia Browne, who claims she can tell the future and see angels.

Browne is one of the United States' best known psychics, a best-selling author who frequently appears on Montel Williams and CNN's Larry King Live. In a 2001 appearance on Larry King, goaded by Randi, she seemed to agree to take the Million Dollar Challenge. She later backed away in an open letter to Randi on her website.

"As the saying goes, my self worth is completely unrelated to your opinion of me, and I've worked far too hard for far too many years, and have far too much left to do, to jump through hoops in the hope of proving something you've staked your reputations on mocking," she wrote. "I have no interest in your $1 million or any intention of pursuing it."

That's a disappointment, because if Browne's claims were ever to stand up to a scientific test in an adversarial process, it would be an unprecedented event in modern history, potentially changing our scientific understanding of the universe. Instead, you can buy a psychic phone call with her for $700.

Unlike Browne, Edward has never flip-flopped on the Randi test. He won't do it. In an appearance on CNN Headline News last October, he dismissed the notion with a quip. "Would I allow myself to be tested by somebody's whose got an adjective as a first name?" he said -- a reference to Randi's stage name, "The Amazing Randi."

CNN host Glenn Beck didn't press Edward for a serious answer. Instead he asked Edward about the time he contacted his mother beyond the grave -- "What was that like?" -- then opened the phones to callers looking for psychic advice. Edward specializes in passing messages between bereaved family members and their deceased loved ones; he told the first caller that someone in his family has cancer.

Edward didn't respond to an e-mail query for this story; Browne didn't return a phone call, and neither responded to several minutes of intense concentration. The other two psychics in Randi's fantastic four are Israeli spoon-bender Uri Geller and James Van Praagh, co-executive producer of CBS' Ghost Whisperer.

The media's lightweight treatment of professional psychics is a deadly serious matter to Randi. "People like Sylvia Browne have a very high profile, and she's always going to be on Montel Williams and she's going to be on Larry King," he says. "And they know what's going on, they're smart people. They know what's going on and they don't care."

Riled by clips like Edward's Headline News appearance, Randi's made media skepticism the theme of the 5th annual The Amazing Meeting in Las Vegas, a four-day skepticism conference kicking off Jan. 18 at the Riviera, where the full details of the revamped Million Dollar Challenge will be revealed to 800 attendees without the gift of prophecy.

Slashdot Top Deals

Heard that the next Space Shuttle is supposed to carry several Guernsey cows? It's gonna be the herd shot 'round the world.

Working...