Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Gene Testing Often Gets It Wrong 1

BarbaraHudson writes: From the you-pay-your-money-and-you-take-your-changes dept

ABC is reporting that gene test for risk of specific diseases are not as accurate as were thought, with different labs giving different interpretations.



At least 415 gene variants now have different interpretations that could sway a medical decision, such as whether to have healthy breasts or ovaries removed to lower the risk of cancer, or to get a medical device such as an implanted defibrillator to cut the risk of sudden cardiac death.

"The magnitude of this problem is bigger than most people thought," said Michael Watson, executive director of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, one of the study's authors and a partner in the data pooling project.

And it can harm patients. Rehm described a woman who had genetic testing and wrongly was told she did not have elevated risks for breast cancer. She later developed the disease but could have had preventive surgery had the right gene analyses been done.

Comment Re:Misnomer (Score 1) 392

My ex half-filled an empty tank with diesel. I said to fill it the rest of the way with gas, drive around for a few hours, filling it every hour. No problem. It's not necessary to drain the tank completely, just have a layer of gasoline floating on the diesel. The diesel will eventually all be burned off, and when the exhaust doesn't smell like a Mac truck, you can stop topping up the tank.

And the owners manuals for heavy equipment give ratios of gasoline to #2 diesel to use in extreme cold when #1 isn't available.

Comment Re:Why is this dribble on the front page? (Score 2) 445

Why? For asking for some evidence? That out of all the gods that man has had, that even ONE of them has some actual basis in fact? Because I'm not willing to believe in any of them just because someone says that their bible says so (the fallacy of argument from authority).

Many of the same people who refuse to accept tons of evidence for global warming) accept the bible without a shred of evidence. "You gotta believe ." No, I don't. It's not intolerant to point out that the emperor hasn't had clothes for thousands of years, any more than it was "intolerant" to denounce slavery or child-beating in opposition to that same bible.

Comment Re: Defective (Score 1) 392

Absolutely correct. "Self parking" and "Pedestrian detection" are two completely separate features using two separate sets of hardware. Here, the driver was manually driving towards people assuming that the radar in the front of the car would tell it to auto-brake. There was no radar in that car, though.

In other words, it will drive over any pedestrians standing in your desired parking spot. I can see how some people would pay extra to be able to claim "it was an accident - the car did it!"

Comment Re:females operate on emotion, not logic (Score 1) 446

You're in the US. You claim there are no homeless shelters for men within 2,000 miles. That's VERY hard to believe. Even a quick look at google maps shows that every point in the continental US is within 2,000 miles of a homeless shelter.

There's a bunch of them in Montreal, some for men, some for women, some for teens, even for LGBT.

Doing a quick search, there are homeless shelters in every Canadian province, and every state that I looked at at random.

The rest of your post is as fact-free. You're being paranoid.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem in this country without having a 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, talk.politics.misc

Working...