Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - A mysterious piece of Russian space junk does maneuvers

schwit1 writes: What was first thought to be a piece of debris left over from the launch of three Russian military communication satellites has turned out to be a fourth satellite capable of maneuvers.

The three satellites were designated Kosmos-2496, -2497, -2498. However, as in the previous launch on December 25, 2013, the fourth unidentified object was detected orbiting the Earth a few kilometers away from “routine” Rodnik satellites.

Moreover, an analysis of orbital elements from a US radar by observers showed that the “ghost” spacecraft had made a maneuver between May 29 and May 31, 2014, despite being identified as “debris” (or Object 2014-028E) in the official US catalog at the time. On June 24, the mysterious spacecraft started maneuvering again, lowering its perigee (lowest point) by four kilometers and lifting its apogee by 3.5 kilometers. Object E then continued its relentless maneuvers in July and its perigee was lowered sharply, bringing it suspiciously close to the Briz upper stage, which had originally delivered all four payloads into orbit in May.

This is the second time a Russian piece of orbital junk has suddenly started to do maneuvers. The first time, in early 2014, the Russians finally admitted five months after launch that the “junk” was actually a satellite. In both cases, the Russians have not told anyone what these satellites are designed to do, though based on the second satellite’s maneuvers as well as its small size (about a foot in diameter) it is likely they are testing new cubesat capabilities, as most cubesats do not have the ability to do these kinds of orbital maneuvers.

Once you have that capability, you can then apply it to cubesats with any kind of purpose, from military anti-satellite technology to commercial applications.

Submission + - These Drones Hold the Key to Understanding How Fast Greenland Is Melting

merbs writes: Thank glaciologist Jason Box for the Arctic bird’s-eye view of one of the most serene, alien landscapes on the planet. Box spends much of his time in Greenland, where he uses drones to measure 'dark snow'—snow that has accumulated soot and dust, thanks to human activity—which absorbs more sunlight and melts faster. Drone photography, then, may hold the key to understanding just how fast Greenland is melting.

Submission + - New study shows three abrupt pulses of CO2 during last deglaciation (washington.edu)

vinces99 writes: A new study shows that the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide that contributed to the end of the last ice age more than 10,000 years ago did not occur gradually but rather was characterized by three abrupt pulses. Scientists are not sure what caused these abrupt increases, during which carbon dioxide levels rose about 10 to 15 parts per million – or about 5 percent per episode – during a span of one to two centuries. It likely was a combination of factors, they say, including ocean circulation, changing wind patterns and terrestrial processes. The finding, published Oct. 30 in the journal Nature, casts new light on the mechanisms that take the Earth in and out of ice ages.

“We used to think that naturally occurring changes in carbon dioxide took place relatively slowly over the 10,000 years it took to move out of the last ice age,” said lead author Shaun Marcott, who did the work as a postdoctoral researcher at Oregon State University and is now at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “This abrupt, centennial-scale variability of CO2 appears to be a fundamental part of the global carbon cycle.”

Previous research has hinted at the possibility that spikes in atmospheric carbon dioxide may have accelerated the last deglaciation, but that hypothesis had not been resolved, the researchers say. The key to the new finding is the analysis of an ice core from the West Antarctic that provided the scientists with an unprecedented glimpse into the past.

Submission + - Antares rocke explodes on launch 1

sneakyimp writes: The Antares rocket operated by Orbital Sciences Corporation exploded on launch due to a "catastrophic anomaly" after a flawless countdown. No injuries are reported and all personnel are accounted for. According to the audio stream hosted by local news affiliate WTVR's website, the Cygnus spacecraft contained classified crypto technology and efforts are being made to cordon off the wreckage are. Additionally interviews of personnel and witness reports are to be limited to appropriate government agencies so that an accident report can be generated. This accident is likely to have a detrimental effect on the stock price of Orbital Sciences Corp, traded on the NYSE. The Antares rocket's engines are based on old soviet designs from the 60s. While this is sure to be a blow to NASA due to the cost, it may well boost the fortunes of their chief competitor, SpaceX. Both companies were recently awarded resupply contracts by NASA.

Comment Will they just pull the words, and ask... (Score 5, Informative) 451

I've seen this type of thing before. They will just pull the words, get their funding, then when someone apples for the job they will then ask in the interview. If they are "caught" in the interview, they will blame the interviewing person... say "sorry" and continue.

Submission + - Avalanche on an asteroid, due to close pass with Earth (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit writes: On Friday the 13th in April 2029, a football field–sized asteroid named Apophis is expected to pass, with luck, within a hair’s breadth of Earth. The space rock won’t do any damage to Earth—it’s predicted to pass at a safe distance of at least 35,000 kilometers—but the reverse may not be true. A new study finds that the near miss could trigger tiny avalanches on Apophis.

Comment Re:Irony: I'm asked "not to" when I use such skill (Score 1) 553

a) The unused hardware lying around somewhere centrally, the company has paid for. b) Your bosses budget hit to access this unused hardware, and the target to reach, affecting his income.

And back to my point: Why do I get cut off --- rather than a simple "this might/would affect our budget" ?
... and to add to the fun: Why would computers already paid for and not being used affect a groups budget?
... ... and to add more fun: Other (remaining) employees made use equipment (computers) form other's that had left w/o issue - - or asking.

The problem starts higher up there.

Yep....
The whole point here: Communication. You seem to be hell bend on "the boss is always right" ... not (as I'm trying to accomplish) "lets see if we can make this better".

Comment Re:Irony: I'm asked (Score 1) 553

People bring and have thumb drives there all the time. Other than improving productivity (and size) this is no different.
Also ... Ever hear of "anti-virus"? Novel idea, might want to look into it. Not to mention that there has been virus software released on new production equipment.
Sometimes you need to think out of the box -- oh, that was my original though..

AC - you are just not thinking, much less critical thinking, much less examining how improvements can be done at the work place. You see, a real manager would have raised these as issues and concerns, not shut me down before I could finish the sentence.

Comment Re:Put yourself in your employee's shoes. (Score 1) 553

"Think about it: what happens to that drive if you get laid off?" .... that was what I had already said: It was a gift to the company. The company can keep it. Then there is the part two: Going down the slippery slope: What about personal equipment already connected to the computes - Headphones, turn table, cell phones, thumb drives; and yes these are all here and used.

Also, you are missing the point: This was one of several times -- when thinking out of the box to creatively solve a problem.

Get you head out of your _ss.

Comment Irony: I'm asked "not to" when I use such skills (Score 3, Informative) 553

As a Software Test professional -- I continually ask questions that that others find embarrassing (and shouldn't). In my present job -- I am currently run two test systems. The company recently let about 10% of its staff go and extra hardware is not an issue (as confirmed by the help desk). My manager wants me to get rid of one system. Here at work, we need to keep on inventory many different configurations and many different languages. A friend GAVE me a 1TB drive to bring to work. I was going to bring it in to help with my VM (Virtual Machine) library. I went to my manager to let ‘em know - I couldn't even finish the question – and the response was “if you are running out of disc space, split the VM’s with the other testers” Here – thinking is not rewarded.

Comment Recommend: Hard Drive Sentinel (Score 4, Informative) 170

I install the shareware version of Hard Drive Sentinel on all my Windows systems. It not only will warn you about hard drive usage (%); it will also warn you about errors on the drive -- and in my case I was able to predict that two drives were going to fail (saving data) before they actually failed.

Their support has been very responsive and courteous, their product can work through (see drives behind) most RAID controllers.

And no, I don't have any affiliation with HDS.

Comment I call BS on this article. (Score 2) 370

Though I'm not a bit fan of MS... They continually have shown that they have no problem leaving old architecture in the dust -- when it suits them. When 2K3 came out, they made a "code optimization" change that left all P1, P2, P-Pro multi-processors behind. Few of their drivers are compatible from one version of an OS to another (and they can be digitally signed to one version). MS has not problem leaving "old" tech in the dust.

Because Mac chose a bad font .. don't attack MS.

Slashdot Top Deals

If a subordinate asks you a pertinent question, look at him as if he had lost his senses. When he looks down, paraphrase the question back at him.

Working...