Comment Re:minutes to midnight (Score 1) 252
That seems to be the difference from my perspective.
You may not call it invading. The US may not call it invading.
Russia, or especially North Korea, might.
Basically, what you're saying is that you think that if someone on US soil does something illegal, and hides the evidence offshore, the government shouldn't be able to get to said evidence without jumping through a crapton of legal hoops?
That's (legally) how the world has worked for hundreds of years.
Why is this a surprise to you?
Change government entities and see how good it sounds for ANY other government to come into your country without legal basis there and take what they deem needed in their courts.
You might want to cite some reference for you position.
Make sure to include references where they're also operating in separate countries.
You might want to go look up what is a crime in those countries. You better be ok with ALL their laws.
That's actually pretty easy to do.
Sure, but where can I get 1 billion hepa filters today?
Oftentimes, life gets in the way.
Let me guess where you're from.
A place where imagination is non-existent.
I'll tell you what.
Pick a country, any country other than the US. Let them have it for the next 25 years.
Now imagine you're neither country. Dependent on a bully country and some other random country for your internet control. Which would you take? Or the UN?
Yeah, lets compare a 40 year old monopoly company (making money w large contracts) to a bunch of small upstart developers (making money $0.99 at a time) and laugh.
More people are laughing at you.
Life is a whim of several billion cells to be you for a while.