Comment Re: Not a laywer. (Score -1) 224
Regardless, the entire logical premise of this "article" is STUPID!
HOW DOES SENDING EMAIL OVER ENCRYPTED CHANNELS "PREVENT" EMAIL ADDRESS TYPOS? I mean seriously, WTF? What kind of logic breakdown leads from "so and so mis-typed the email address" to "this would not have happened over encrypted channels"? Near as I can tell, yes, it would have had exactly the same effect - it just would have come in on port 995 instead of 110. I just don't get the "leap" in logic that leads from a to b in this case.
That said, yes this sounds like something that should have been sent via snail mail, but by the same twist of logic, how would that prevent them from mistyping the postal address and sending it to the wrong person in the exact same way?