Comment Grossly inaccurate article. (Score 5, Funny) 482
They claim that the best looking man only received 38 messages in four months. That's totally untrue. I received 43 messages.
They claim that the best looking man only received 38 messages in four months. That's totally untrue. I received 43 messages.
$45 unlimited. nuff said.
umm...excelsior?
How did we confirm the luckification of these mice? Are the mice in my lab as lucky as the ones in this experiment?
Since Xbox Live and all siloed online gaming is a means by which we are tracking the gifted and talented drone pilots and Dalek operators of the future, this is a mission-critical breach. We need to get computers out of the hands of these hacker terrorists, or else parents might get wise.
Publishers revoking editions ebooks isn't a ban. It's stupid, irritating, and a great example of why I am against DRM, but it's not a ban.
I was talking about selling books.
Your interpretation of Ingsoc's jealousy is light. Sex is very important. Love is more important. 1984 is not a pro- or anti-theistic work. You do the work's message a disservice when you attempt to use it for a tangentially related polemic in this way. I would hate to see a theistic person's desire to read 1984 discouraged by an inaccurate representation that the work is atheist in its message.
Great comment. I love 1984, but I'm tired of hearing how it's banned. I've never seen it banned.
Ingsoc is atheist. Try reading.
Where the heck is the anarchists cookbook? I remember mail-ordering it in high-school and then promptly setting our shed on fire.
Are the two events related?
I think HDM is an international mega-hit, and "banning" by Catholic schools was a godsend to the publishers. Yeah, I said godsend. I crack myself up. You guys know how baited protest marketing works, right?
AFAIK, the protest against HDM was baited, like the "rioting" at the release of the film "Do the Right Thing". The only people who protested HDM were gullible right-wing panic button types in the lead up to the release of a dud film that needed all the publicity help it could get. Not banned. Rushdie would be a better choice by far.
Her marketing consultant may have advised her to not identify as sci-fi. Or maybe she figured it out herself. Either way, it's a smart move. Marketing matters to professional writers who need to eat. Atwood does NOT belong in the same marketing campaigns as the latest Doctor Who book. Even taking the "classics" approach, listing her alongside genre greats like Asimov and Heinlein would also be a disservice to her sales. Genre snobbery isn't changed by anyone's critical opinion. It's best for her marketers to avoid the association.
I'm not sure this is true. We need to research this further. It's only 99 percent obvious, so clearly, we need more research. Where do we apply for a grant?
It seems to me that U2 and Apple are conspiring to piss us off.
Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.
