Nope.

The US Constitution is a very old piece of paper sitting in a museum.

The Supreme Court is a group of people.

A piece of paper is an inanimate object - it can't do anything.

I don't understand why we don't just restrict companies to do the thing they're supposed to do.

I don't understand why people can publicly advocate fascism and expect to not be called out on it.

Who is "we" and what makes them so special such that it's legitmate for them to give orders to other people?

Your explaination is reasonable and reveals the headline, and 99% of the comments on this article, as being inaccurate and misguided.

I predict it will be ignored because the audience is more interested reasons to scream at each other and push agendas instead of facts.

$$$

Also, there's far too much child sexual abuse in the world, with a disturbingly high fraction of they population complicit in one way or another, for society to talk honestly about the topic. There is a very vocal minority with an extremely strong incentive to divert any discussions away from that area.

Shakesphere used "their" as a singular. What you learned in school was revisionism.

What? You're using logic and critical thinking? You must be a terrorist and/or traitor.

In theory it's possible to provide more bandwith if there's more revene coming in topay for the infrastructure.

Since the wireless market is a cartel enforced by licensing AT&T has little to no incentive to behave well.

The EISA should be called the "GE Payment for Services Rendered Act of 2007"

Same shit, different day. Large corporations help politicians gain power. Politicians return the favor by enacting legislation favorable to the bottom line of said companies. A story is invented to help sell the fleecing to a gullible public, and most of them are happy to be taken hook, line, and sinker, "Well if they say it's better for the environment then it obviously must be true. Think of the children!"