So you just arbitrarily assigned a different gender to President Lawnchair, just because?
I'm going to stun you with this one: the President is no more a girl than his name is "Lawnchair".
The strongest economies right now all have more regulations in their markets than the US.
I'm going to stun you with this one: regulation is not economic activity. Our regulator over-reach has produced an over-damped system. I suppose, in your inverted world-view, that you can blow away a significant chunk of the workforce, and then say that unemployment is low. Because "the recovery". Also "Bush". Now, if we want to be Obama apologists and claim that the Progressive Project was out of gas, and this crash was inevitable, fine. Let's admit that it's time to quit jacking about, and change course to something more capitalistic, were insurance cartels aren't raping the American people.
But that would involve, for example, more people starting smaller insurance companies that drive down costs, deliver service, and actually fail and die when mismanaged.
Now why under the sun does our market not function naturally? Well, it's been sodomized through regulatory capture and Socialist policies, that's why. Socialism says that the government is (substantially) God, and the unreflective masses go along with this. Thus, our current crisis, where a President stares at an unreadable pile of legislation/regulation and just makes it up as he goes. You are soooo the winner here, sir.
Only by the conservatives.
Oh, how casually you blow by the creepy child worship. I guess it harms The Narrative.
You're not qualified to make such a statement. You clearly don't know socialism beyond conservative talking points
Socialism is a scam, a preaching of "The Kingdom of God, hold the God" and will always tend toward economic stagnation or worse. 2+2=5, you'll never get sons from sodomy, and Socialism is a scam. May enlightenment find you, sir.
He specifically asked you if anyone on slashdot is defending the Health Insurance Industry Bailout Act of 2010. In other words, you did not answer his question at all. Instead you ignored the question entirely and talked about me.
And of course no one is, because that piece of legislation does not exist outside of the swamp that is your mind.
50 bickering corrupt fiefdoms certainly is no better than one big one.
I strongly disagree with you here.
50 little fiefdoms cannot achieve the kind of global corruption you find in DC. And the culpable throats are much closer to the voters. Think about it. Please.
English is a moving target. Always has been; always will be.
Just as Anglo-Saxon and Norman French begat English, they're currently pulling in Spanish for a sort of menage a tortilla, if you will. You just have to go sanguine on language, man.
Consider the fact that Obamacare is now simply untethered from law or policy. This week the administration announced that you can get a hardship waiver from Obamacare if your hardship is . .
So the Tea Partiers are sold out. This will be a hard lesson. Welcome to the natural political cycle. My real point is not that there is anybody virtuous enough to hold office (there is not) but that we need to liquidate incumbents as often as possible, and then cram a term limit amendment up t