Your argument regarding killing people is absurd, you don't seem to be able to accept the fact that wind is cheap and solar is about to get very cheap too.
Yes, I know it's absurd, but it's the argument you are making, not me. I'm saying that your position logically leads to that. I'm just cutting to the chase and bypassing all the sideline arguments (like your last post).
Look, you can put on the rose colored glasses if you want, but until it makes financial sense enough to get places like China and India to start using this stuff because it's cheaper than the CO2 emitting stuff you are trying to replace, it's USELESS. If they don't follow suit, all your efforts are only going to cripple you, your people and your economy and weaken our position in the world, and not have any effect on the issue you are trying to solve. The Chinese will just burn more of the fuels that you only succeeded in making cheaper for them. The ONLY way this works is if the renewables you are pushing become CHEAPER, actually CHEAPER, not including subsidies. Until then, blather on, it's pointless.
So Solar will never be cost effective. It's 4-5 times more expensive now. Wind is close, but it's still more expensive by 2 times. Geothermal is a limited resource, but it's still 1.5 times natural gas. There is ZERO chance that solar will knock off 3/4ths of their costs in the next decade. Wind is not going to get 1/2 of their costs cut either, being it's a more mature technology now. The engineer in me says "NOT GOING TO HAPPEN" at least not without a huge jump in technology. So far I am unaware of any technology advances that could possibly lead to such cost reductions. Oh I see all the prognostications of the "save the world" advocates, I just don't see any technology on the horizon that is going to allow their ideas come true.
So, Yes, the case you are advocating is stupid and absurd, when pushed to it's logical conclusions. Either that, or it's already doomed to fail and a stupid thing to advocate. Take you pick...