Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:They *still* libel Linux (Score 1) 170

Some distributions used to also distribute ABI compatibility, back when commercial software targeted Sco/Unixware/Xenix etc and ignored Linux. See here for example. These days, I expect it is the other way around - anyone left still shipping traditional Unix on x86 (or even other architectures) needs to provide a Linux ABI if they want to ensure that proprietary software will run on their platform.

Comment Re:They *still* libel Linux (Score 1) 170

Linux has been able to run executables from BSDs, SCO Unix and a few other x386 Unixes since quite early on. You also need all the dependencies from the target system, and constructing such a system would require a license for the Unix variant in question, but the binary compatibility is there in Linux. The question is whether it contains any SCO copyrighted code. The answer is a definitive no - what code is common appears to have come from BSD, or is trivial headers that could easily be common by chance, and more importantly, a court has already delivered the judgement that Novell, not SCO, owns the Unix copyrights.

Comment Re:Destruction of documents (Score 3, Informative) 170

They kept all the documents related to how IBM had put the same header files to some POSIX APIs in Linux as what SCO saw in Unix, right down to the function prototypes being in the same alphabetical order, but sneakily they had changed all the comments to hide their copying. The documents they destroyed were the ones related to the fact that Novel, not SCO owned the copyrights in question. There was no point to keeping those documents, as SCO have already lost that case and exhausted all avenues of appeal.

Comment Re:Ticketing through emails only (Score 1) 144

An issue tracker with email interface can save a lot of time. Not having to log in to receive notification of new issues and being able to quickly comment and close issues by simply replying to an email does save a lot of time. But how do you search existing/previous issues, or check what is outstanding with an email only tracking system? I guess you could send commands and it emails you back, but this isn't exactly efficient compared to a web interface.

Comment Re:It is never about the tool (Score 1) 144

If the process is undefined to start with, it is better to bring in the tool first and build a process around this. In my experience, when introduction of new tools fails, it is usually because people get fed up fighting a tool that almost but not quite fits their process. The key to success is to make sure the benefits of using the tool are clear to the users and there are no additional headaches associated with its use.

Slashdot Top Deals

The nation that controls magnetism controls the universe. -- Chester Gould/Dick Tracy

Working...