Comment Not surprised. (Score 3, Funny) 32
Something that small and aerodynamic you could easily get maybe 20, 30 feet if you really threw it hard enough.
Something that small and aerodynamic you could easily get maybe 20, 30 feet if you really threw it hard enough.
AFAICT, Swift is essentially the ObjC machine and object model in a sane language, so it ought to plug right into OpenStep.
Close. So close.
LLVM, not ObjC. Swift is basically is an interface to LLVM. Chris Lattner, one of the major people behind LLVM, works at Apple and created Swift.
Depends on what your domain of knowledge is.
If you want to get a good grip on something like say, sociology, learning with and from people who understand the finer nuances of the subject matter are important.
Besides, it's not like being self-taught doesn't have it's own perils either.
I'm not discounting self-education. If you can self educate? Great! But there's value in formal education, and while I'd hire a programmer who was self taught, I'm not hiring a self-taught lawyer.
I feel really sorry for you if you think that education is just someone sitting down and absorbing knowledge with out having someone there to answer questions and fill in the gaps that may be left for whatever reason.
It's almost as if there's a greater context to why Apple did the things they did and maybe the super nerds are wrong about apple needing to be more "open."
Actually the idea that someone knows better than I do about how policy works is the basic idea behind representative Government.
Also, Government dependency claims are complete bullshit.
Very few of the people who are enough to qualify for SNAP or TANF or any other assistance sit there and go, "THIS IS GREAT! I don't have shit to do."
Do you know who the actual productive people are in this country? People at the bottom end of the spectrum. American productivity at lower and middle class levels are at insanely all time highs.
Also you're being extremely classist with your assertions about what it's like to be extremely poor. It's easy to take care of an apartment or a house when you've got money to burn on replacing the windows, fixing the walls and maintaining a domicile. It's much harder to do that when you've got no money and the Super doesn't give a shit.
The reason why poor students fail to take advantage of primary education is that life when you're poor *sucks.* It makes it hard to concentrate when your parents are fighting about the rent and no one's home to help out.
You don't fixing that problem by getting rid of the safety net. You fix that problem by making it less shitty to be poor. You're proposing we make it more shitty to be poor because fuck those poor people they're not thankful enough that we let them be poor.
The only reason why this would happen isn't because of fiat currencies, it's because of poor Governance. It's not an inevitability that our financial system will collapse. Any system run by morons will collapse.
The problem is, is that we do need to spend more on things like infrastructure, including schools. Including higher education. These things are falling apart and wise spending now can pay off huge in the future.
We also need to raise taxes.
This article discusses fiat currency but doesn't discuss Brazil's amazing success it had with the URV and now with the Real?
Economics are an abstraction of the ability for an community to trade goods and services with other communities; whether it's backed by gold or fiat. Really, all economies are fiat since the amount of gold that equals a loaf of bread is entirely arbitrary.
Existence of debt doesn't matter. Total debt matters. We might be on the wrong side of the ledger, but to think that we should get to zero and stay at zero is a disaster waiting to happen. To say that we can't do some social program because we've got debt also is a disaster waiting to happen. We can lower the debt and offer social services to the citizenry if we
I know, shocking! Taking in money then spending that money for something else! It's amazing, there's another article on the frontpage about how Germany is just flat out doing as I suggested and paying for university and college. They're getting great returns for their investment.
Yet, in America, we have people in positions of serious power who believe that Governments are about as capable as a 2 year old child and must be shrunk down small enough to be drowned in a bathtub.
Do we know when Vulkan was conceived? The trademark for Vulkan was filed in February, so... I don't know the behind the scenes dynamics at Khronos or Apple.
Metal has been worked on since at least 2013, when the betas for iOS 8 were being written. Metal as an API has been ready to ship since iOS 8 came out. Vulkan's still in the proof of concept stage and might replace or augment Metal in the future.
Is Vulkan ready yet?
Because Metal has been shipping since iOS 8 and usable now.
Microsoft has their own API but you're not crying foul about DirectX
Symbian code signing was like 200 bucks every six months(So 400 a year!) back in the Symbian days and you got little to no support.
BlackBerry signing was a little complicated and had three tiers of API usage, each tier costing $100.
Qualcomm had their own requirements that was something like 100 apps for 400 bucks for use on the Verizon game store.
So in 2008 when Apple announced that it was going to only cost $100 bucks for unlimited apps and all public APIs with a storefront that you could make money on, it was a godsend.
Apple sheep here(I own 3 daring fireball shirts, so I think that should establish my sheep cred here).
It's marketing pablum. It's not slower, and really, that's more than what I can say for other OS upgrades.
errr. no?
You're assuming that we completely pay off the debt. That's a really bad idea, because that's just getting our balance sheet to completely zero for no good reason other than the fact that zero is an arbitrary round number.
Having debt and being able to create debt is a good thing, because it allows for money to flow in and out of the system. Having some debt on hand shows that we're serious about trading on our obligation and allows us to borrow when we need money. It also means that when we face inflationary periods we can put all of that extra money somewhere and plug the hole.
Being able to meet our debt obligations and having a debt small enough where our obligations are not onerous on our budget is what's important. Not being free of it.
Finance at the national level isn't anything close to what finance is like at the personal level. Even then, having some credit lines open and having some debt on the books is a good idea. Maybe not thousands and thousands of dollars worth, but most of us will own a home or have a credit card or two that's got some debt on it.
I'm always looking for a new idea that will be more productive than its cost. -- David Rockefeller