"In fact, this is part of the ecosystem, especially in the hip hop world. It's why the artists also support those hip hop blogs that the RIAA insists are dens of pure thievery. The artists release their tracks to those blogs, knowing they'll get tons of downloads — and actually get money. If they do deals with labels, they know they'll never see a dime. Putting music on Megaupload is a way to get paid. Working with a gatekeeper is not."
Do you think that the US DOJ is being used to crush competition for incumbent "gatekeeper" industries, who have a history of taking maximum profits, without adding tangible value?
I support the core idea of SOPA while opposing the bill, and I suspect many others do too. If you don't read the damned thing, SOPA sounds like "let's reduce the rampant unchecked piracy online."
But why would reducing piracy be a good thing? Because the RIAA and MPAA lobbies are claiming trillions of dollars in imaginary losses? How can they be reporting record profits at the same time?
The fact is, piracy has been reduced to an emotional issue, where the beneficiaries of these laws claim ridiculous losses and lobby legislators for more regulations to "save the starving artists". SOPA, PIPA, ProIP, the DMCA and every other copyright law of recent years were flawed from the get-go, as they were based on shaky, emotional assumptions, not evidence of a real problem. But heck, I'm still waiting for evidence that the copyright monopoly itself is a net positive to society, let alone its various overreaching extensions.
Life is a healthy respect for mother nature laced with greed.