Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Negative campaigns (Score 2, Interesting) 187

It's sad but it does seem to be the case. Maybe they have become disillusioned after years of trying to raise awareness and finding that the common folk just didn't care. If they speak about the importance of free software principles, their words will fall on deaf ears. But if they aggressively raise these red herring issues that the average person can relate to, they will get some much wanted attention. It's hard to tell whether they will win any permanent mind share this way.

Even though Stallman is absolutely right about free software, the message of bright red colours, screaming slogans and extreme statements does paint the FSF in a bad light and will probably put many people off.

FSFe seems to be much more reasonable: maybe the two are playing a game of good cop/bad cop?

Comment Re:The Slashdot system seems to work pretty well (Score 1) 393

Most people won't read beyond the first page (or even half page) of any comment board, so the early posts get the most attention, mod points or not. Of course, if you display new posts first, you get a bunch of redundant threads as people re-post essentially the same thing other people posted earlier on.

It has always annoyed me how it's tolerated here to hijack threads near the top of the discussion. But, as you point out, reversing the order has its own problems. If that's the case, why not just display all sibling comments in random order? Take the UID or a session ID as the seed so they don't jump around too much, but every person sees them differently. You might still get some reposting, but it overall it could improve the format of the discussion.

Alternatively, after a while, start biasing the order in favour of threads with lots of replies. Then you get the best of both worlds.

Of course, any such fundamental changes won't happen before the new javascript interface is ironed out, which is to say probably never. Still, it's an interesting problem to think about.

Comment Re:Free as in BSD (Score 3, Insightful) 163

I'm tired of this sad trolling. GPL advocates never complain about the BSD license. It's only BSD advocates that complain about the GPL. You know what? Just because you want to use other people's code without having to respect their conditions doesn't give you the grounds to demean the GPL, dude.

Comment Re:Put it another way (Score 1) 694

After he begs forgiveness he lays them off anyway and has a driver take him to the driving range to relax hitting a few balls, then goes and singa karoke and drinks himself into a stupor.

No, of course not. He drives a tanto knife through his guts and bleeds to death, thus saving his honour. Don't you know anything about the Japanese?

Comment Re:What? (Score 1) 98

And why is that?

I haven't heard of other countries arbitrarily seizing domain names from web sites that the government doesn't like, without due process, without a way to appeal, and without even notification. But this is exactly what the US has been doing recently [1, 2]. This ranking is completely worthless.

[1] http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-government-seizes-bittorrent-search-engine-domain-and-more-101126/
[2] http://torrentfreak.com/us-resume-file-sharing-domain-seizures-110201/

Comment Re:Hidden linux (Score 2) 648

Yes, and it doesn't matter how many devices run Linux. Increasing that number has never been an important goal for anyone but maybe Linux developers. The important number is how many devices are open and how many users actually use that openness to run free software. As computer-literate users, we care whether we trust the software on the device, whether it acts in our interests and whether it is we who control it and we don't have to share that control with an external entity. By campaigning for the proliferation of Linux, we don't really act in our own interests. What we should be campaigning for is that devices give us the ability to install and run solely (or at least mostly, where it matters) free software. Then we can feel comfortable and in control when using them.

Comment Re:Terrible Article, Serious Issue (Score 1) 360

Arguably, we already have a solution to the bone loss/zero-G pregnancy problem: use a centrifuge to generate acceleration. By the time we send out humans to spend so much time in space, we will probably have incorporated them into space vessel designs. On the other hand, we still don't have a good solution for space radiation shielding: good shielding takes up large amounts of mass.

Slashdot Top Deals

He who steps on others to reach the top has good balance.

Working...