Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment The More They Spend The Less I Want (Score 1) 111

This is just stupid. The entire Triple A over spending is about putting in intrusive DRM that makes me not want to touch their games. I'm find with traditional DRM since the old school NES Cartridge is DRM, but not this Project 5 Dollar theft, and not this Always Online nonsense. The only reason the Indie's are getting any success is because these big companies are trying to eat themselves out of house and home. Just give me my periodic RPG's and I'll be happy. As it stands I'm starving for content that just isn't coming.

Comment Re:Retrieving memories causes decay? (Score 1) 426

We're talking about the compatibility by a Turning Machine. Which puts Pi into the realm of Non-Computable. It is really a choose your own adventure of definitions, but any number that cannot be represented to an infinite precision is not actually computable. A Turning Machine will always run into a rounding error when it try's to output the value. You can use the other lax definitions that say you can reduce it down to a function that can output the value to the "desired" precision, but that's hardly infinite precision when you look at the output.

Comment Or a lot more preprocessing (Score 1) 105

It easily could be that your mind is simulating everything a few moments into the future. Trying to anticipate the actions of others, your own actions, and the possible events that could occur. Occasionally it could find something's going to fall, but can't insert an action far enough ahead to prevent it from starting like tipping a cup. The result is you responding to a falling cup prior to you knowing it was going to fall.

Comment Re:I wonder (Score 3, Insightful) 119

You say that it's "optional", but it's not. If you view it as a scam investment like Tulip Bulbs that can bankrupt people you warn people away from it in some vain attempt to save them before they are ruined by it. It's not optional because when friends and family are dupt into it, and loose their shirt it's going to hurt you even if you didn't personally invest one penny in it.

Comment Re:this is reassuring (Score 1) 481

No, it's not security though obscurity, it's security though not being on the internet, not needing the internet, and not wanting the internet. The older tech prevents someone from even being able to hook it up to the internet even if they wanted to. The internet is one big security hole, and if you don't need it then anything that prevents you from having it is a plus for security.

Comment Re:One word: FUD (Score 0) 271

Worst case scenario is every plane in the air falls to the ground like a rock. That is were the half million number gets a large bump from. It's unlikely you'd hit the entire US with an EMP at the highest point in the day for air travel, but that would be the worst case initial conditions. People who make worst case scenarios out of what is most likely to happen shouldn't be writing up worst case scenarios.

Comment How Exactly (Score 4, Insightful) 271

TFA is kinda small on any details, but what do you expect from Fox News. How exactly does 2 Billion "protect" everyone from an EMP weapon? Have we found something as good a what we currently use, but won't break? Old Vacuum tubes are a nice protection against a system that could go down, but you never want it to go down. You can't really use the good vacuum tubes ether so you're stuck in 1940's tech for a lot of stuff. How exactly does this 2 Billion stop the pace makers from breaking, the planes from falling, and every hospital patient from dying in those few initial hours. That money might help for long term protection by setting up a process to recover from such an event, but I don't really see anything that says it will protect us from the massive initial death toll.

Comment Re:Designer babies (Score 1) 155

At this point I view eugenics as nearly always bad. With most "improvement" we'll most likely reduce our diversity, and that's pretty bad. Then there is what we view as good for us, and what is good for us is sometimes two different things. There does seem to be a form of what I'll say is epieuginics coming about were instead of tampering with the DNA in a way that removes diversity that it just turns off the currently undesired gene, but could later be turned back on in a future generation. What I've read of it being used for treating down syndrome looks promising, but we'll have to wait, and see.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Just think, with VLSI we can have 100 ENIACS on a chip!" -- Alan Perlis

Working...