A company that's come close to abolishing Reply All is the global information and measurement firm Nielsen. On its screens, the button is visible but inactive, covered with a fuzzy gray. It can be reactivated with an override function on the keyboard. Chief Information Officer Andrew Cawood explained in a memo to 35,000 employees the reason behind Nielsen's decision: eliminating "bureaucracy and inefficiency."'

I hope somebody replied to all, quoting this entire memo and putting "OK" at the bottom.

$25 x 70 million units = $1.75 billion

Of course it needs internet access! How else do you think it will keep its anti-virus software current?

Regardless, it's not stealing because the DivX community still have them.

Oh no! What will the local DivX community do without their subtitles, now that they've been stolen!!

Oh wait, not really.

I'm sure many people like them, but a big reason for an iPhone is status symbol, so include faux iPhone gel covers for trac phones.

They need a mechanism like a chess clock . When a candidate presses his button, his microphone turns off and his opponent's clock starts running. If a candidate runs out of time on his clock, then he can't talk for the rest of the debate.

Replacing HFCS with sugar isn't going to reduce consumption.

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/86/1/116.full

Isn't there a marketing danger to naming your product almost "paper weight"?

You have to insure the car, and you probably want to insure the house, because that would be crippling if it burned down.

You don't have to insure cars either. You have to insure against the liability of damage done with a car.

I would support my son taking an iPhone-building internship. Foxconn conditions might suck, but I'm not fundamentally opposed to students doing physical work.

So is if we, as natural animals, cause the resurrection of another species, it is because we deemed it fit to survive. Who are you to stop the natural processes of scientists?

So now that we're past plastic plates, here we really go to Star Trek's Replicator. All that remains now is the ever growing list of "objects supported".

I'm waiting for Paramount to sue a person for printing pirate copies of a toy replicator.

Never trust a reactor over 30.

It's two movies in the same way the last Harry Potter book was two movies. Quite literally, more bang for buck.

Or perhaps more buck for bang.