There are several pieces above by posters who try to logically and calmly explain why they are against the teaching of creationism, or the weakening of the teaching of evolution as the accepted theory.
Its only accepted by racist Nazi communists like you.
So, your argument is that since you and your buddy are assholes who are prone to throwing around homophobic sexual smears in private, women should be thankful that you aren't also misogynistic pigs in public as well?
Why do you have to call names? And why be a hypocrite?
And evolutionists do not want students to think critically when it comes to evolution.
Cuts both ways, that knife does.
So true.
Another Ice Age? We are still in the late-middle to tail end of the current Ice Age.
Why use Linux when you could use OpenBSD? We've been running OpenBSD routers for quite some time now and their networking is far better, consistent and more robust than in Linux. Just having PF alone is reason enough to use OpenBSD.
-Matt
Why use Linux? Because Linux has a more stable, scalable, faster and more robust network stack than OpenBSD.
That's quite silly. Considering this brings back the missing features that everyone was missing like a start button and boot to desktop. This puts it on par and better in many ways than Windows 7.
The start button does not doing anything useful. And its still missing the Start Menu, and I very much prefer Aero over the ugly flatness of Windows 8 metro interface.
This is why a mid-range Intel part (Say, an Intel Core i5-4670K) can handily (and significantly) beat AMD's top-of-the-line desktop CPU (An FX-8350)
Really? CPU Benchmarks says
i5-4670K - 7531
AMD FX-8350 - 9091
A comparable Intel chip would have to be closer to i7-3820, not your i5. Perhaps your benchmarks are a little crappy?
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-8350+Eight-Core&id=1780
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-4670K+%40+3.40GHz&id=1921
Anyway, AMD is far more $$$ efficient for typical desktop. Yes, including any thermal envelope differences.
Finally some facts.
lolz wrong story
Avast is lightweight... I am ruining it right now on 450mhz pentium 2 with 384mb of ram. Avast is the only free av that didn't slow this machine down.
Avast is lightweight... I am ruining it right now on 450mhz pentium 2 with 384mb of ram. Avast is the only free av that didn't slow this machine down.
There has no proof of any kind that PS4 is running FreeBSD or any *nix for that matter. SSYI
All I see are a couple of pictures. It starts with GRUB in one picture, which could suggest that it's Debian kFreeBSD, or maybe GRUB2 loading regular FreeBSD. Then in the next picture, someone's loading libstdc++, suggesting that Sony isn't totally against the GPL, and even then the license version hasn't been established yet.
So basically, the idea that it's based on "modified FreeBSD 9.0" comes from one sentence on a site I've never visited. Might one of the experts here correct me? I've seen only enough kFreeBSD to run back to the real FreeBSD rather quickly, not much longer than that. Thanks!
There's nothing in the linked story that proves that its running FreeBSD. It could just very well be running NetBSD, MINIX, Haiku or a Sony Made OS.
Title is a lie.
Have you tried ArchLinux?
Arch lost its way when it started shipping and System D as the default init and banning users from its forums for disagreeing with that dreadful action.
I was once a Arch user a couple years ago. It was a awesome distro back then but now it has lost the KISS way!
How dare you call Stallman a such a name. You scumbag, you're not even fit to pick the cheese of off Richards feet.
"One lawyer can steal more than a hundred men with guns." -- The Godfather
