Pretty much my sentiments too. There's plenty of debate (albeit sometimes less than lucid) on both the political and scientific sides of the fence, the issue is that the press is mostly focussed on the political side of things and that then skews people's opinions of what is going on. On the non-biased scientific side, it's pretty much a done deal; real, on-going and that we are partly to blame - with much of the remaining debate surrounding just how big a part we play, since that is what we can possibly do something about and the amount is still far from certain. It's the politicians, lobbyists and paid-for "scientists" that are spouting all the denials and confusing statements making it seem like it's still in doubt at this point, and until more of the mainstream media starts providing balanced coverage of the debate that's the general impression that the masses are going to believe.