Comment Re:This again? (Score -1, Troll) 480
That is what peer review, replication of results and further study are for...and I am biting my lip not to add "dumbass" to the end of that sentence.
If I were to peer-review a paper on this, I would insist on a plausible physical explanation for the claimed measurement. The burden of proof is on them: they are making a truly extraordinary claim, one that, if true, would entail revising all of physics from its very foundation.
When somebody sounds like a total fucking crackpot, they almost always are.