Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Germany should pay war reparations for WWII (Score 1) 743

Poor economies need weak currencies to enable profitable exports.

Or they can use a strong currency, and lower their wages.

I don't understand what you mean by this (I'm serious, not being facetious): weak economies need to export goods and services/import currency. Greece doesn't need to worry about anyone wanting their drachmas - they should be trying to get dollars/euros/etc *in*, not drachmas *out*. Hence my reply to "printing money that nobody wants". Sure, nobody wants it outside of Greece, but a weak currency for Greece means that, for things Greece does not need to import, it becomes cheaper to live.

Sure - they'll pay more for iShinies and automobiles. But, they'll pay less for food (they *can* grow themselves) and a weak currency gives them more value on any goods/service surplus they possess. With the strong currency, it doesn't matter what austerity measures they take - they'll still drown.

PS. It's nice to have someone disagree on slashdot without first hurling insults about "crying manbabies", "clueless noob", "libertard/republitard", etc. Please keep up the good work :-)

Comment Re:Germany should pay war reparations for WWII (Score 2) 743

The country that leaves instantly get's the ability to control their economy

How ? By printing money nobody wants ?

Currency control is widely acknowledged as one of the levers used in directing the economy. Surely you are not proposing that currency control has no effect no the economy? After all, Greece probably won't care if no one wants their drachmas; creditors (like Germany) will have to either take it or forfeit the debt.

Managing the exchange rate is something a country can do if they print their own money. They can't do it if they have no control over the currency. Poor economies need weak currencies to enable profitable exports. Rich economies need strong currencies to enable profitable imports. Greece would do better with a weak currency than with a strong one at this point.

Comment Re:Germany should pay war reparations for WWII (Score 4, Insightful) 743

Nobody bankrupted Greece except Greece -

As I keep pointing out, weak economies have nothing to gain and everything to lose if they cannot control the production of their currency. The weakest EU member (currently Greece) will always be at a trade disadvantage if forced to use money not under their control. Weak economies use a mixture of both currency and interest rates to reign in a spiral. Greece can't do this if they're using the euro.

Grexit now is much less harmful to Eurozone than it would have been two years ago, so being kicked out of the house isn't out of the question at all.

Hah! The EU would be much more harmed by a country leaving than the country that leaves. The country that leaves instantly get's the ability to control their economy. All the EU gets, OTOH, is the danger set by a precedent. Only the rich countries benefit from a common currency. Should all the poor countries leave those rich countries would be in more than a little trouble.

Comment Re:ENOUGH with the politics! (Score 1) 1094

Sure, more little dollars for everyone! Anyone bother to think of the ramifications involving this country printing money every 6 months just to keep the governments doors open? They call it hyperinflation and raising minimum wage is a component of that. Want to see where that road goes? Take a good look at South Africa.

You're confused. I'm in South Africa. I live here. We have never had hyperinflation. Perhaps you meant "Zimbabwe"?

Comment Re:You got me to jump through hoops - congrats (Score 1) 776

Not going looking to play a pathetic little deliberately time wasting game while time was short is of course the reason - and where did the +3 come from? New goalpost shift from the shitting seagull by the looks.

Here - Eat your words: you said more than one comment floated to +3 If you aren't prepared to eat your words, you shouldn't say them!

Here's an entire article with a vast number of comments along those lines: http://science.slashdot.org/st...

Too old? Then let's try this one: http://science.slashdot.org/st...

Ah. So when you claimed that comments about women being unsuitable for tech were at +3, you meant in a different story?

That's actually quite funny, I assumed that you were making claims about that story. Why on earth would I suddenly post comments about different stories?

Comment Re:Is it a Mad Max movie though ? (Score 1) 776

So not being content with flying in from nowhere and shitting all over me, refusing to justify why then buggering off, you now want me to go off on a fishing expedition? Why do I have to provide proof (which you've ALREADY SEEN FFS) while you get to attack me for what your invisible strawman did?

You made the claim that numerous such posts exists. I couldn't find even one. Neither can you, it seems. There's no point in replying anymore - you can't find an example of such a comment/post, and neither can I.

Comment Re:Is it a Mad Max movie though ? (Score 1) 776

Every fucking time there is a "women in IT" or "women in STEM" article on this site there are plenty, are you really telling me you have not seen at least a dozen by now?

You said :

Some of the AC shit about how women have unsuitable brains etc has floated up to 3 or more.

yeah, I don't believe you: prove me wrong and link to one, please.

Comment Re:Men's Rights morons (Score 1) 776

What does that have to do with empowerment?

It's got everything to do with fear. Man I tell you, if I was part of a demographic that was the majority in college degree's awarded and minority in deaths, incarceration, fatal disease, dangerous occupations, victim of violence, etc ... well, I'd keep my mouth shut :-)

Comment Re:Is it a Mad Max movie though ? (Score 1) 776

Obviously it's a reply directly to a "poor me I can't do anything right" post but don't let your choice of pretending to be an idiot get in the way of reality.

It's anything but obvious.

By logic it applies only to "whiny virgins who feel they should have got a free supermodel" despite your attempt to show otherwise.

Nope - I even quoted it so that you won't get it wrong - parent in that thread said "Nerds are...", and you went ahead and replied "you forgot..."

You painted with a broad brush, and I called you out on it - all the abuse in that story is directed *to* nerds, not by them, and you happily joined the mob.

However you got very quiet instead of contesting the subject when I pointed out how far you were off the mark earlier, and here you are back without addressing it - so OK for you to dish it out but not me even when I wasn't actually dishing it out?

What mark? I got busy, it was a weekend after all, so for the fourth and final time, I ask you can point out the upvoted comment that you claimed was made that said "women are unsuitable for tech". You actually claimed that many such comments were made, IIRC, not just one.

(I actually understand: you have to *believe* that it exists. Because if it doesn't exist it means that you were part of the mindless mob. You don't want to believe that you'll be part of a mob.)

Slashdot Top Deals

Dynamically binding, you realize the magic. Statically binding, you see only the hierarchy.

Working...