Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Time To End The Union? (Score 1) 1108

Rhetoric solves nothing and I believe I was quite polite enough in responding to someone who suggested that I'm not American enough to continue to be part of the United States. Dissolving the Union would cause untold amounts of problems, economically and politically. and would solve none of the issues you seem to have. Besides, the nation is only on the brink of civil war if you believe the nuts whose job is scare everyone in order to raise ratings so they can sell you more crap. I've been in almost every state and worked or lived in several of them, north and south, east and west. There are plenty of Americans in every state that could be called bible thumpers, just as there are plenty of overly enthusiastic atheists. Most Americans are somewhere in the middle with maybe some religion, but also an understanding and appreciation of science, even if they don't really understand much of it. Stereotypes of the southern and midwestern states as ignorant raving Jesus humpers shouting "I aint no damn monkey!" are nonsense even if there are a few of those people out there.

My original statement stands. Yes, I am a Real American. And a southerner. And a person who understands science. Please take your secessionist bullshit elsewhere.

Comment Re:The real issue.. (Score 1) 211

Yes! All this crap about heavy users hurting the ability of lighter users to access the network is just FUD crap. Dynamic throttling of connections that are using a larger share of bandwidth when the network is nearing being overloaded is the correct solution to this problem. Throttling users after a certain amount of data is used is just stupid. They were perfectly able to use all they wanted to the detriment of the other users at the beginning of the contract month and that's not a problem, but after a set amount of data it then becomes somehow worse on the network? WTF?

Biasing the throttling during busy periods towards the users who have heavier usage patterns would even be acceptable, but if there is spare capacity, why not use it? Oh, you want to be able to charge more money even though you advertised and sold these unlimited plans? I see.

Comment Re:"Unlimited data" (Score 1) 211

No. It means your bandwidth is reduced when you hit those thresholds, you continue to be able to exchange data beyond the 3GB/5GB, just more slowly. They're not cutting anyone off, they're throttling to prevent average users from being negatively impacted by the highest percentile users. Wireless bandwidth is limited and shared, and this is just a way of ensuring the heaviest users don't hog it all.

Oh, that makes perfect sense, seeing as how there is obviously more bandwidth available at the beginning of the month and much less available towards the end of the month when those limits are imposed and connections throttled </sarcasm>

Comment Re:Glad they found the error (Score 1) 414

How is this being modded informative?

Not to worry though, it won't take long;

A guy running for president is called anti-science. He responds, "No, you're anti-science!" Standard political bullshit, nothing to do with science.

after all precedents exist

A couple of small-time politicians in 1897 briefly consider a bill for placing a method of squaring a circle into the public domain, until people who understand math better tell them it's wrong.

and, if the electorate require it,

UK asks citizens what laws to repeal; gets tongue-in-cheek response to repeal the laws of thermodynamics. Sounds like a couple geeks making a joke,

I'm sure the politicians will oblige

Completely fabricated story from a fake news site.

( ;) )

Unrelated XKCD comic.

Why did you even bother finding links that totally do nothing for your argument? Should have stuck to the emotional appeal of "dumb politicians hate science"

Comment Re:Excited (Score 2) 276

Too bad, I give it 10-20 years from the moment this stuff hits the shelves until the first leftist country bans real meat.

Really? With all the anti-GMO propaganda and fear I figure it's more likely the synthetic stuff will be much more likely to be banned. The anti-meat folks are a pretty small minority compared to the OMG-evil-science crowd

Comment Re:Bullshit (Score 1) 406

Nobody feels sorry for you for overselling your service even more than you calculated you were going to. Shut up and provide customers the service they bought with those billions of dollars of profit you make every quarter, even in one of the worst economies since the Depression. You'll find nobody here shedding a tear for you.

Oh, they knew how badly they were overselling their service, it was just too tempting for them to go ahead and take all that extra money and hope the problem goes away eventually. All the data providers seem to be doing it. My mom recently switched from Comcast to Century Link for her home internet and television to save some money. In the three months before I got her to switch back it never worked a full day. The Century Link guys came out five times and couldn't ever fix it, then one of them let slip that our area was around 10x oversold compared to capacity and that was why the television and internet would die often and not work again for 20 minutes to a few hours.

I think the plan for both of them was to oversell now then use that income to build the network you already promised you had. Only they never got around to that second part.

Slashdot Top Deals

What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.

Working...