How many devices will a) need to be solar powered; b) need hydrogen storage; and c) be satisfied with an 80 hour lifespan? There may be a niche market, but to have any real impact it will (together with the H2 store and the fuel cell) have to be smaller, cheaper or safer than the equivalent 80 hour primary batteries.

The real point is that she should be allowed to refer you to someone who is allowed, in this case a dermatologist. The whole GP-as-gatekeeper issue is really profit-driven disfunction. Of course, in most jurisdictions medicine is a self-regulating profession statistically dominated by GPs, so it may be a while before that changes.

Good luck with that.

The Internet Archive says that it subscribes to the The Oakland Archive Policy which for |requests by governments" says:

Seems like this may just have slipped past them. Let's make sure they know they need to sort it out... Surely they only removed it from the Wayback Machine, not from the archive itself.

Never was, never will be. Just say no to "All your life are belong to us", wherever you see it.

Interesting analysis, but the conclusion is wonky. The problem you highlight is caused by two things: grossly distorted pricing structures intended to subsidize "renewables" and perception-skewed design safety profiles (out of all proportion to real risk) that artificially jack up the cost and delay the approval, build & commissioning of nuclear while encouraging the burning of more dangerous fossils or the broiling of birds in sunbeams. For the most part, totalitarian states don't have these problem, they can do the sensible thing without worrying over NIMBY. Odd though, that China keeps building coal plants despite their access to nuclear.