Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:There's an easy way to find out (Score 1) 185

Between 2 and 3 is a very crucial step that is easily missed but very, very important:

Get a HR department with a clue and keep them out of the hiring process.

Because if you offer something like this, you can (and must) pick your talent. You will get access to the best who come with a built-in productivity rate of a factor 2+, and you will have to identify them during the hiring process.

Basically what you have to do is what Ford did back in the day. He paid his workers REALLY well. In turn, everyone wanted to work for him, so he could pick the best and most productive mechanics for his factories. His workers were also pretty worried that they may lose that killer job, so they did anything and everything to make sure they don't get fired because that was a once-in-a-lifetime thing. Fuck this up and you lost.

If you offer something like this, and today the big deal is a shorter work week, not paying 5 bucks an hour more, you have your free choice of talent. And of course you have to make good use of that.

Comment Re:That begs the question ... (Score 1) 185

Back when I was in development, I did have a developer I paid full time who was here for about 25-30 hours. During a "good" week.

I refused to "force" him to come in 40 because the last thing I wanted was that a person who can write flawless multi-threaded code from scratch would be pissed over being rewarded for writing flawless multi-threaded code with having to work more. His productivity was already about a factor 1.5 or 2 above anyone else, so why should I piss off the most productive person on the team, and the go-to person when shit hits the fan to get something fixed?

Comment Re:Funny (Score 1) 185

The last time we had a work hour reduction in my country was in 1975. From 48 to 40 hours. Ever since, productivity has increased twofold to twentyfold, depending on industry.

And now people want to lower their work hours by 1/5. Not even their productivity, but yeah, let's say we lower productivity by 1/5.

Care to tell us how those companies even survived back in 1975? Cutting down hours AND having only about 20% productivity on average to start with? How did they even manage? How could they possibly stay in business?

Comment Re:Funny (Score 1) 185

Not so new at all. It's been the consultant's mantra for decades now.

"10% more with 10 percent less"? Never heard of it? Consultants have been selling that bullshit for ages. You can always increase your productivity by 10% and cut your workforce by the same 10%. Every year. No really, that's what they're selling.

And suddenly, after decades of following that creed religiously, it's a "ridiculous notion"? Perish the thought! You think the consultant who has been selling you this sage advice for so long could be wrong?

HERETIC!!!

Comment Re:Inexperienced people giving advice ... (Score 1) 185

The sad reality is most people need the structure of a work week.

That's fine, then give these people the structure of a work week and leave us who are capable of self organization out of that bullshit.

From a job, I need mostly money. I don't need an occupation, I'm quite capable of keeping myself occupied and busy.

Comment Re:Inexperienced people giving advice ... (Score 1) 185

Pretty much this right here.

Fridays are the worst. Everyone's basically watching the clock tick down to 1pm which is also the time when I can safely break SLAs and start running the security tests I should only do after work hours, because nobody but me is around who would even notice that some systems go down.

You don't think anyone gets anything sensible done on a 9 to 1 Friday, do you?

Slashdot Top Deals

Administration: An ingenious abstraction in politics, designed to receive the kicks and cuffs due to the premier or president. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...