Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Russian oil tycoons behind US "greens"? (freebeacon.com)

mi writes: A shadowy Bermudan company that has funneled tens of millions of dollars to anti-fracking environmentalist groups in the United States is run by executives with deep ties to Russian oil interests and offshore money laundering schemes involving members of President Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.

With oil prices plunging as a result of a fracking-induced oil glut in the United States, experts say the links between Russian oil interests, secretive foreign political donors, and high-profile American environmentalists suggest Russia may be backing anti-fracking efforts in the United States.

Comment Re:So what will this accomplish? (Score 1) 154

Apartments are practically divorced from price competition

They aren't a good example, because they are the most massively-regulated thing out there (in the large illiberal cities).

they get more expensive when more middle class move to an area

That's perfectly natural — the price-rise is easily explained by the rise in "opportunity cost". The rental unit's continued existence as a rental needs to compete with the possibility of selling it for a nice lump sum and investing the money elsewhere.

Submission + - The "mammoth snow storm" falls flat (ap.org)

mi writes: You heard the scare-mongering, you heard the governors and mayors closing public transit and declaring driving on public road a crime . But it turned out to have been a mistake. Boston may have been hit somewhat, but further South — NYC and Philadelphia — the snowfall was rather underwhelming. Promised "2-3 feet" snow, NYC got only a few inches.

Is this an example of "better safe than sorry", or is government's overreach justified by questionable weather models exceeding the threshold of honest mistake?

Comment Re:So what will this accomplish? (Score 1) 154

Who still needs to eat? The billionaire owners of Uber?

If they did not need or want to make money — commonly referred to as "needing to eat" in business vernacular — they would've retired to a sunny place long ago.

Fortunately, unlike with taxis, we don't need to decide for them — they have ample motivation to keep fighting for our wallets, hearts and minds or else the competition will come in and eat their lunch. Econ 101.

Submission + - DEA Cameras Tracking Hundreds of Millions of Car Journeys Across the US (itworld.com)

itwbennett writes: A U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration program set up in 2008 to keep tabs on cars close to the U.S.-Mexican border has been gradually expanded nationwide and is regularly used by other law enforcement agencies in their hunt for suspects. The extent of the system, which is said to contain hundreds of millions of records on motorists and their journeys, was disclosed in documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union as part of a Freedom of Information Act request.

Comment Re:What happened to "Bring it on"?! (Score 1) 468

They are only concerned with their own safety, and not of the safety of the public.

Actually, I've noticed the exact opposite... Maybe, we are talking of different things — use your own account and explain, if you wish to continue the conversation.

Legally they are not bound to protect anyone.

I was not talking about legalities — ethics, mostly.

Comment What happened to "Bring it on"?! (Score 1) 468

Brown called the app a 'police stalker,' and said being able to identify where officers were located could put them at personal risk.

Huh?

Police are (or supposed to be) our first line of defense against criminals and other miscreants. Having eaten our bread and taken our shilling, they should be proud of drawing the fire on themselves to protect their masters (that's the rest of the citizenry), not whine the risks...

I tend to think, the whining is done by the pigs among them. The actual officers are fine with it. Right?

Submission + - Space X use Culture ship names

Coisiche writes: In a tribute to Iain M. Banks, Elon Musk has named a couple of Space X drone ships after Culture ships that appear in the Player of Games novel.

If that's a trend there are a lot to choose from.

Submission + - Plan C: The Cold War plan which would have brought the US under martial law (muckrock.com)

v3rgEz writes: Starting on April 19, 1956, the federal government practiced and planned for a near-doomsday scenario known as Plan C. When activated, Plan C would have brought the United States under marshal law, rounded up over ten thousand individuals connected to "subversive" organizations, implemented a censorship board, and prepared the country for life after nuclear attack.

There was no Plan A or B.

Comment Re:Test them in Ukraine today... (Score 1) 208

I wonder how lopsided the drone / antidrone equation really is.

According to this article, Western military drones cost $200K apiece (ballpark — I'm sure, the price-range is wide). Russian ones are, probably, half that. Ukrainians are making their own at $60K.

Whatever it is, the cost of a single military drone is tens of thousands.

Now, a hand-held Stinger — capable of bringing down a real aircraft with a pilot fighting for his life — is quoted on Wikipedia costing $38K (though it is unclear, which year dollars those are). That's decidedly less than a drone already.

Considering that a) the anti-drone missiles don't need to be as powerful and strong as Stingers; b) things made in Ukraine (or Russia for that matter) tend to cost a lot less, a usable missile can, probably, be produced for "only" several thousand dollars apiece.

But even if the US made them — and gave to Ukraine — it would still be good bang for the buck, achieving a valuable military objective without giving Russia too much to protest about, because this new weapon would be "non-lethal".

Comment Re:With taxes you buy civilization, remember? (Score 2) 290

While they may not officially take orders from their superior, the reality is that they do.

Of course! And that's a perfectly normal — as long as the country remains at peace with itself.

Should another civil conflict unravel, however, these arsenals distributed nation-wide and under control of local authorities (each with his own agenda and loyalties) will be part of a problem for any usurper of central power, not part of his solution.

Comment Re:With taxes you buy civilization, remember? (Score 1) 290

There is no dilemma.

Ah, but there is. On this very board we went from the outrage at the government's unwarranted peeking (yet another manifestation of the already much-discussed spying on citizens) to defending the practice against the crazy Libertarians like myself, who laugh and sneer at the idea, that "taxes are good".

your tenuous grasp of logic

It is not about me, dearest. Shove your ad hominems up, where they'll do more good — such for treating your hemorrhoids.

Slashdot Top Deals

As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison

Working...