Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:a reversal to the open cockpit doors of the pas (Score 1) 447

A locked and reinforced cockpit door prevented hijackers from gaining entry to a Chinese flight a few years back [wikipedia.org].

It sounds to me, from reading about the incident, that the locked door was less important than the fact that you can't intimidate a planeful of people by threatening them with death aboard a plane anymore. The passengers and crew jumped the hijackers, and that was the end of that. A regular old door that could be opened from the outside with a code would have worked out just the same.

Comment Re:And what good would it do? (Score 1) 447

The argument that it would not improve aviation safety is silly...

Is it? Why? I would have thought that the existing data is plenty, and that generally speaking airline disasters are not caused by what the interior of the cockpit looks like. How many cameras would you need? Shouldn't you have video feeds from the engines too? Perhaps high frame rate ones, so that we can see what really happened?

Additionally, already the flight data audio recordings are gruesome enough. Can you imagine the videos?

Comment Re:Leave then (Score 1) 886

Those business owners need to state their rules publicly

You mean, like a sign over the door saying "whites only"? Is that what you mean?

This is why:

Ideally, I think you should have the right to not serve someone for any reason.

Is backwards. Ideally no-one would be refused service for any reason, whereas realistically one might be refused service because one is not behaving ideally. In an ideal world, no-one gets turned away.

Comment Re:Do It, it worked in AZ (Score 1) 886

but the main difference between your example and what the law is allowing is that the Grand Wizard chose to be a member of the KKK, a homosexual or a black man did not choose to be homosexual or black

I wish this idea would die. The KKK Grand Wizard probably didn't really choose to be a hateful racist, it's probably a combination of an extremely poor upbringing (being taught to hate at an early age is going to be hard to reason your way out of), and poor intellectual character. A black man probably didn't choose to be black, but if a pill existed to change the color of your skin for personal reasons (hey! I want to be blue!) then one should be free to take it. And if one wants to choose to sleep with members of the same sex, then one should also be free to do so. Religion, of course, is almost always a choice.

These categories are protected, not because they are not choices, but because we as a society have agreed that they should be. Because we've seen some of the things that happen if they are not, and we don't want to go back to that world. Except, it seems, Indianapolis does.

Comment Re:Do It, it worked in AZ (Score 1) 886

That's a pretty good question. The answer of course is that the laws on discrimination are fairly precisely written for a reason.

An organisation is not permitted to discriminate, either when hiring people or when doing business with them, on the basis of sexual orientation, gender or religion. Perhaps there are some other categories too. Whether or not these things are choices - some are, some aren't and some can be under various circumstances - is entirely and completely irrelevant. These are the protected categories enshrined in law, and signed into effect by your country's elected officials.

An organisation is permitted to implement things like dress codes (no KKK hoods...) and other rules about whether or not you are permitted in their establishment. The Klu Klux Klan is not a religion, and so it is not protected. End of conversation, and so no - you do not have to serve him.

It's little different to refusing to serve a guy who turns up naked, or shouting and screaming at your staff, or whatever. You can throw the guy out, and have the cops help you do it if you need them to do so.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...