Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy

Cloudflare Launches a Low-Cost Domain Registrar, Which Will Also Offer Free Privacy To Customers (arstechnica.com) 122

Cloudflare, which is celebrating its eighth birthday has announced yet another service: an at-cost domain registrar. From a report: While Cloudflare had already been handling domain registration through the company's Enterprise Registrar service, that service was intended for some of Cloudflare's high-end customers who wanted extra levels of security for their domain names. The new domain registrar business -- called Cloudflare Registrar -- will eventually be open to anyone, and it will charge exactly what it costs for Cloudflare to register a domain. As Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince wrote in a blog post this week, "We promise to never charge you anything more than the wholesale price each TLD charges." That includes the small fee assessed by ICANN for each registration.

Prince said that he was motivated to take the company into the registrar business because of Cloudflare's own experience with registrars and by the perception that many registrars are in the business mostly to up-sell things that require no additional effort. "All the registrar does is record you as the owner of a particular domain," Prince said. "That just involves sending some commands to an API. In other words, domain registrars are charging you for being a middle-man and delivering essentially no value to justify their markup." Charging overhead for that sort of service, Prince said, "seemed as nutty to us as certificate authorities charging to run a bit of math." (Cloudflare also provides free SSL certificates.)

Submission + - What is really behind Linus retirement and the CoC? (google.com) 1

An anonymous reader writes: Tiago Sousa does an interesting analysis on what might be the reasons behind the news of Linus temporary retirement and the CoC:
I've been watching the reactions to Linus Torvalds' "struggle session" and reflected about why could have caused such a 180 degrees turn regarding his usual stance. The most likely scenario is an ultimatum, of the kind "take it or beat it". At the beginning of the post we have a likely fuse, in which he describes his bad reaction to scheduling problems regarding the kernel summit and, in particular, states that:
my "maybe you can just do it without me there" got overruled (emphasis mine)

It's easy to imagine (yes i'm just speculating) that he said something that pissed off one too many people internally. Maybe it wasn't a serious issue in itself but more like the last straw. Let's not forget Linus is highly paid, far more than everyone else at Linux Foundation, ($1.6M in 2016 — https://twitter.com/bcantrill/...), and this is financed mostly by big corporations. He seems eager to do anything it takes to stay at the helm, as he implies near the end:
I'm not feeling like I don't want to continue maintaining Linux. Quite the reverse. I very much do want to continue to do this project that I've been working on for almost three decades. (emphasis mine)

A totally different perspective is that of one of his daughters, Patricia Torvalds, and activist of "Guerilla Feminism", (really, she runs a local chapter), defender of the (in)famous "safe spaces", and a meritocracy critic in favor of diversity (a recurring theme). With this background, it's not uncommon that she supports the
"Post-Meritocracy Manifesto" (https://postmeritocracy.org/) created by SJW extraordinaire Coraline Ada Ehmke (ex-Corey Dale Ehmke btw):
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux...
It's easy to imagine (again, pure speculation) family discussions over this topic, with such a famous, and persecuted, father.

Which takes us to the other half of the equation, the Code of Conduct (CoC) which was approved with the same stroke:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm...
This CoC is based on the Contributor Covenant and is a creation of the aforementioned Coraline Ada:
https://www.contributor-covena...
She's immensely proud of the thousands of projects that have adopted it, some high-profile indeed, and in most cases "hip" projects of the grand new world of modern web development (), but that's a topic for another day.

At first sight there shouldn't be any problem with a "statute" that informs participants to behave with civility (as if that weren't obvious). The problem is that it goes way beyond that, it's a vehicle to cement the interests of groups that I can only describe as SJW. The dictatorship of the politically correct, in which personal opinions in private life are used to remove a person from a project or to smear the project. Some examples:
https://github.com/opal/opal/i...
https://www.drupal.org/associa...
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/...
https://twitter.com/nodevember...
https://twitter.com/brennx0r/s...
https://developers.slashdot.or...
https://voxday.blogspot.com/20...
Bonus points:
https://github.com/ayojs/ayo (LOL @ "Humans before technology" + archived)

But the most ridiculous aspect comes straight from the source. Coraline has a special interest in ruby and in rails, communities in which it has participated for several years. Not by chance, rails, ruby-gems and similar projects have adopted her CoC. Just a little holdout remains: ruby itself. Unfortunately for her, it was created by a japanese known as matz which imposed from the start the motto "be nice". Only this is not nearly enough for a real SJW. Thus Coraline tried her CoC to be adopted, something matz refused:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/iss...
Instead, what was accepted is something far simpler and more straightforward:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/c...
The main difference from this do Coraline's CoC is the omission of the connection between private life and the project. This is unacceptable for a SJW, to whom everything and everywhere is a battlefield to uphold their particular vision of "justice" and there's no possible compromise, much less for "mere" technical motives.

Since then, her attacks to matz have been relentless (how about "subtly" pulling the rug from under him? https://twitter.com/CoralineAd...) and reached a peak in an unbeliavable tirade on twitter by Coraline herself (the link opens in one of the better ones but read the whole thing, it's priceless):
https://twitter.com/coralinead...
I've never seen something like this coming from Linus, and even his insults are always in technical contexts directed at top developers who should have known better (not poor minorities, unlike the propaganda they spin). This person sits on her morality high horse but behaves worse that anybody.

To prove this isn't just theory, behold, already someone is in the CoC crosshairs by none other than Sage/Sarah Sharp (why the hell are so many name-changing people attached to these dramas?!), the first SJW that tried to take down Linus back in 2013. The target this time is Ted Ts'o, "just" one of the top kernel developers, ext2/3/4 lead among other things and member of the Technical Advisory Board (TAB):
https://twitter.com/_sagesharp...
The goal is clear, remove TAB members and inject more SJW puppets.

So, 2018 is coming along nicely. Another open source project, for me personally the most important one, succumbing to politics. It's plain to see that this is the method of choice of Big Business to control large open source projects that have technically spotless and charismatic leaders. Of course, nothing mentioned in this post appears anywhere in the following triumphant article by one of the main creators of official narratives, that feels more like a stamping of an arranged smear campaign, like an obituary just waiting for the target's demise to be released, given how ridiculously biased it is:
https://www.newyorker.com/scie...

It should be noted that Sage claims, in the twitter thread above, that this story was the reason for Linus' extraordinary actions. However, that's highly doubtful, as even fellow SJW Valerie Aurora admits:
https://blog.valerieaurora.org...
Everything in that piece is common knowledge. There's no new "dirt" on him whatsoever. It doesn't add up. Of course, in the end, Valerie has it backwards: it's not LF that's protecting Linus, it's Linus giving in to LF's demands, which in reality would prefer him to leave. Do I have to remind the number of anti-opensource entities are platinum members of LF? Do you really believe Microsoft, Oracle or Cisco pay $500k/year for nothing? Those are just the more extreme examples, as even Google is far from benevolent these days, and certainly enforces SJW policy, just ask James Damore.

To me, one of the largest organizational problems in Linux since forever is the lack of abstraction for drivers, as anyone that has depended on out-of-tree drivers knows. If only Linus had accepted stable in-kernel APIs to isolate and standardize drivers out of mainline, it would be easier to fork the (real) kernel should the need arise. In other words, his efforts to maintain lordship over Linux have been used against him. Like they say in a certain movie, Vanity, definitely my favorite sin.

(translated and slightly revised from the portuguese original in https://plus.google.com/u/0/+T...)

#linux #linustorvalds #coc #coralineada #sjw #politics #censorship #diversity #meritocracy

Submission + - Meet the 25 y/o Musician Developing Propulsive Landing Tech for Amateur Rockets (vice.com)

dmoberhaus writes: Joe Barnard started working on rockets as a hobby but three years later he has turned it into a self-sustaining business. He is making thrust vectoring and propulsive landing technologies available to the amateur rocketry community, technologies that are usually reserved for only the most powerful computers on the most powerful rockets in the aerospace sector. Motherboard spoke with him about the difficulties involved in landing a DIY rocket and how a young musician pivots to the aerospace industry.

Submission + - Last new nuclear reactors in US facing opposition (arstechnica.com) 1

Muckluck writes: Ars Technica reports: Major owners of the new construction are set to hold a "go / no go" vote. This essentially is a deciding vote by stakeholders on whether the project should continue or be scrapped. 20 Georgia lawmakers are asking project leaders to cap costs putting additional pressure on this stakeholder vote.

New technology is expensive in this arena and it is a long term bet for stakeholders. If they pull it off, it will be set to provide base load capacity for the region for over 40 years. In these projects, the stakeholders pay for this power (both plant and fuel) in "today dollars" with the expectation that over time, they will recoup that cost for both the stakeholders and the rate payer. Abandoning the project represents a huge sunk cost with no hopes of recovery of the costs.

What do you think?

Submission + - Amazon Plants Fake Packages In Delivery Trucks As Part of Undercover Ploy (businessinsider.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Amazon uses fake packages to catch delivery drivers who are stealing, according to sources with knowledge of the practice. The company plants the packages — internally referred to as "dummy" packages — in the trucks of drivers at random. The dummy packages have fake labels and are often empty.

Here's how the practice works, according to the sources: During deliveries, drivers scan the labels of every package they deliver. When they scan a fake label on a dummy package, an error message will pop up. When this happens, drivers might call their supervisors to address the problem, or keep the package in their truck and return it to an Amazon warehouse at the end of their shift. Drivers, in theory, could also choose to steal the package. The error message means the package isn't detected in Amazon's system. As a result, it could go unnoticed if the package were to go missing. "If you bring the package back, you are innocent. If you don't, you're a thug," said Sid Shah, a former manager for DeliverOL, a courier company that delivers packages for Amazon.

Cloud

Adobe's Next Major Creative Cloud Release Won't Support Older OSes (petapixel.com) 308

nehumanuscrede writes: Adobe ruffled a lot of feathers when they decided to cease selling their standalone products and go subscription only. While a lot of folks complained, it doesn't seem to have had much (if any) of a negative impact on Adobe financially. Now, according to PetaPixel, Adobe is poised to cease support for older operating systems by depriving those users of upgrades and updates beyond the cut-off date, even though those users are paying customers (and have been for years). I'm curious if those impacted will upgrade to the more modern OS, or simply find an alternative to Adobe software (paid or otherwise).

Personally, I'm still rocking Windows 7 because, in my opinion, there isn't anything wrong with it. So, in the near future, it seems I'm going to have a choice to make: Drop my Creative Cloud subscription, upgrade to an OS I absolutely loathe like Windows 10, or continue paying full price for apps that will cease receiving updates (which was Adobe's whole argument for going with the subscription method in the first place so folks will always have the latest updated software). What are your thoughts?
"Your Windows won't be supported if you haven't upgraded beyond the Windows 10 Anniversary Update (v1607) that was released to the public on August 2, 2016," reports PetaPixel. "And if you're on a Mac, you won't be supported if you haven't upgraded beyond Mac OS 10.11 (El Capitan), which was released on September 30, 2015."
Technology

Is Your Email Address Holding You Back? (wsj.com) 354

Whether you're freelancing or on the job hunt, don't let a poorly conceived online handle limit your career prospects A quick glance at any group email confirms what recruiters and hiring managers know too well: Not everyone sheds their adolescent email addresses when they enter adulthood, instead maintaining allegiance to digital monikers based on the music, videogames and contraband they once held dear. From a report: Though rebranding yourself online can be a pain (as those who've been through the ordeal of changing their contact info know), the practice is often better for your career trajectory, said Chris Swanson, a career and college counselor at Bremerton High School in Washington state. "It's just like the idea that a handshake and eye contact makes a good impression. That's the first thing that comes across someone's desk." Even so, many Americans still use curious handles for professional exchanges, either by virtue of inertia or nostalgia or because they've never had an employer-issued handle and don't know any better -- they only know Dave Matthews rules.

[...] It might be ironic to send missives from @aol.com, but it doesn't suggest an exceedingly tech-savvy candidate. Actually, "It weirds me out," said Ms. Moore. "Why are you still using AOL? Gmail is definitely the winner." Don't even get her started on Hotmail. When updating a resume it's a good time to evaluate if an email address seems dated, especially if applying for a tech gig.

PHP

As PHP 5.6, Still Used By a Large Number of Websites, Approaches Its End of Life Deadline, Some Worry About the Consequences (linkedin.com) 151

An anonymous reader writes: I know PHP isn't to some devs liking, but chances are you know people who work with PHP or have sites that are built with it. PHP 5.6 and 7.0 are shortly coming to the end of the support period for security patches, so what plans have you made to migrate code and sites to newer platforms? With apparently huge numbers (80%) of sites still running PHP 5.6, there appears to be little industry acknowledgement of the issue. Is there a ticking PHP Time Bomb waiting to go off?
Privacy

Spyware Company Leaves 'Terabytes' of Selfies, Text Messages, and Location Data (vice.com) 58

An anonymous reader writes: Spyfone, a company that sells surveillance software to parents and employers left 'terabytes of data' including photos, audio recordings, text messages and web history, exposed in a poorly-protected Amazon S3 bucket. News outlet Motherboard verified that the researcher could access anyone's data by creating a free account and installing the spyware on a test device. After a few hours, the researcher sent me back a picture I took.
Robotics

New Study Finds It's Harder To Turn Off a Robot When It's Begging For Its Life (theverge.com) 327

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: [A] recent experiment by German researchers demonstrates that people will refuse to turn a robot off if it begs for its life. In the study, published in the open access journal PLOS One, 89 volunteers were recruited to complete a pair of tasks with the help of Nao, a small humanoid robot. The participants were told that the tasks (which involved answering a series of either / or questions, like "Do you prefer pasta or pizza?"; and organizing a weekly schedule) were to improve Nao's learning algorithms. But this was just a cover story, and the real test came after these tasks were completed, and scientists asked participants to turn off the robot. In roughly half of experiments, the robot protested, telling participants it was afraid of the dark and even begging: "No! Please do not switch me off!" When this happened, the human volunteers were likely to refuse to turn the bot off. Of the 43 volunteers who heard Nao's pleas, 13 refused. And the remaining 30 took, on average, twice as long to comply compared to those who did not not hear the desperate cries at all.
Businesses

New York Threatens To Kick Charter Out of State After Broadband Failures (arstechnica.com) 83

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Charter Communications could lose its authorization to operate in New York State because of its failure to meet merger-related broadband deployment commitments, a key government official said. NY Public Service Commission (PSC) Chairman John Rhodes said that "a suite of enforcement actions against [Charter] Spectrum are in development, including additional penalties, injunctive relief, and additional sanctions or revocation of Spectrum's ability to operate in New York State," according to a PSC announcement last week. Charter agreed to expand its network in exchange for state approval of its 2016 purchase of Time Warner Cable (TWC). New York officials say that Charter has failed to meet its commitments, even though Charter claims it has. Rhodes accused Charter of "gaslighting" and noted that the PSC has already ordered Charter to stop making misleading claims about its broadband deployment progress. The PSC last month ordered Charter to pay a $2 million fine and complete the promised network construction. If Charter doesn't meet its merger-related obligations, the company will "face the risk of having the merger revoked," the commission said at the time. A revocation of the merger could force Charter to spin off its Time Warner Cable division in New York, but it wouldn't affect Charter's ownership of TWC in other states.
Cellphones

Sprint Follows Rivals By Complicating Its Unlimited Mobile Data Plans (fortune.com) 55

Sprint on Thursday unveiled a new, more complicated lineup of unlimited mobile data plans. Sprint goes from having one plan starting at $60 per month to four different options costing $50 to $70 a month. "The main price hike hits customers who want to watch streaming video at HD quality instead of being reduced to DVD quality," reports Fortune. From the report: A new "Unlimited Plus" plan most resembles the carrier's current one, with subscribers allowed to use up to 15 GB monthly before experiencing slowed download speeds, receiving HD-quality streaming video, and getting free Hulu and Tidal subscriptions. It costs $70 for one line, rising to $180 for four lines. But Sprint also added a "limited time" promotion that cuts the price to $50 to $100 per month for customers who buy a new phone or bring their own device. A cheaper "unlimited basic" plan, starting at $60 for one line and up to $140 for four lines, slows downloads to 3G speeds after just 500 MB, downgrades streaming to DVD-quality, and offers just a Hulu subscription, but no Tidal account.

Although consumers no longer get cut off or have to pay expensive overage charges when they run through a monthly data allowance, they face an increasing array of restrictions and conditions on all but the most expensive unlimited plans, including slowed download speeds. Sprint's four-page press release announcing the new plans included 11 footnotes, signaling just how complicated they are.

Twitter

Game Company Fires Two Employees Who Complained About 'Mansplaining' on Twitter (theverge.com) 1056

An anonymous reader quotes the Verge: On July 3rd, narrative designer Jessica Price tweeted a 29-tweet thread dissecting the challenges of writing player characters in an MMORPG. A streamer who goes by Deroir responded, "Really interesting thread to read! However, allow me to disagree slightly," and shared a three-tweet explanation of how narrative design influences player expression in the sort of games that Price narratively designs. Price both replied directly to Deroir, tweeting "thanks for trying to tell me what we do internally, my dude," and retweeted his response with the caption "today in being a female game dev: 'Allow me -- a person who does not work with you -- to explain to you how you do your job....'"

Price's suggestion that Deroir was mansplaining game development -- an area where he does not have the same knowledge or experience -- sparked anger among the ArenaNet community. She subsequently responded to those criticizing her on Twitter. [Here's the first lines of that tweet. "Since we've got a lot of hurt manfeels today, lemme make something clear: this is my feed. I'm not on the clock here. I'm not your emotional courtesan just because I'm a dev. Don't expect me to pretend to like you here. The attempts of fans to exert ownership over our personal lives and times are something I am hardcore about stopping."] Price was fired shortly after. Although many fans are comparing this to something like working in a restaurant -- be polite to the customer, or get fired -- Price says it's impossible to talk about this incident without larger context about systematic online harassment, particularly the sometimes abusive relationship between fans and game developers and the failure of game companies to address it. "Game companies are generally unwilling to be honest with themselves about how they're complicit in creating and sustaining that environment," she tells The Verge...

Price adds that she believes her firing was an emotional reaction on the part of ArenaNet co-founder Mike O'Brien. "He fired me personally, and the meeting was mostly him venting his feelings at me," she says. "I understand being afraid when you see the Reddit mob coming for you, but if people with less power can weather it -- and we do, regularly -- so can he...."

"We can probably fire anyone on the GW2 dev team as long we make a big enough stink," wrote one user on the Guild Wars 2 subreddit. "Nobody at Arenanet is safe from the hand of reddit. We're literally running the company now..." UPDATE (7/12/18): That user eventually clarified that their remark was satirical, identifying themself as an angry Reddit user who felt powerless and "surrounded by individuals who are so thoughtless and shitty I was hoping I'd appeal to some sort of sense of decency by writing the most vile shit I could think of... I took it down because I realized that nobody was going to disagree with me."

ArenaNet also fired Peter Fries, a writer who'd worked for them for 12 years, apparently for defending Price in a series of now-deleted tweets. (For example, "Here's a bit of insight that I legitimately hope [Deroir] reflects on: she never asked for his feedback.")

"The message is very clear, especially to women at the company," Jessica Price tells the Verge. "If Reddit wants you fired, we'll fire you. The quality of your work doesn't matter."

Slashdot Top Deals

Any program which runs right is obsolete.

Working...