Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Wait... wait... (Score 1) 42

I've been a spotify subscriber for... well since they opened up to the USA, and I have never noticed anything about lyrics. I only play it in my ears and in the car, and now I'm shocked to find that they actually display lyrics at all. That's the first thing I think, and the second is: what? Most songs never display lyrics when you listen to them, at least that's how it's been for most of my life so I don't even understand what the fuss is about. Do you need spotify to tell you the lyrics so badly that you might be upset about them going away? I guess maybe I'm just 'get off my lawn'ing here, but this seems like a silly thing to make such a fuss over

Comment Reality Check (Score 1) 96

Yes the FTC passed the rule. Chamber of commerce has already said they're going to sue to get it tossed. It technically abrogates existing contracts and the 'law' was made by unelected officials. I foresee that this will be tossed. It's too bad, because I agree that non-competes are a real reason why we don't have as much innovation and they are indeed one of the major barriers to new startups. However, I just don't think it's gonna make it.

Comment Re:Now to remove dependency (Score 1) 16

I'm running it locally on 2 different platforms, without an internet connection. It doesn't contain any code. it's just the model weights so there is literally no way it can be calling home (feeling the overwhelming urge to insert 'you idiot' here but I'm resisting.) Care to restate your alarmist rhetoric?

Comment Economic Viability (Score 1) 338

When the solar companies are complaining that they're going to go out of business without more subsidies for their services, that is a good clue that they are not providing the value that they are taking. If they are going to go out of business because their customers cannot afford them, then they should.

Comment Protest is fine, but not on company time (Score 1) 522

Americans have the right to protest till their hearts are content; however, that does not mean there will not be consequences. For example, losing ones job for protesting on company time, obstructing company operations, and being an overall general idiot. Google pays these people to do work not because they need a job, but because they presumably do one. If they're not doing it, see ya! This is exactly like the free speech misunderstandings: people rightly realize we have the right to free speech, but that doesn't mean it's without consequences. And it certainly doesn't excuse you from any other responsibilities, like the contract you sign for employment at google.

Comment They are literally the last company (Score 4, Insightful) 30

The last company I would want having access to my span port is google. Sure they know everything about me already, but heck if I'm wrapping it up in a gift box for them. I use a VPN for ad blocking, not increasing google's stranglehold over me. It's like their VPN is exactly the opposite, a worst case scenario, of what I would ever consider.

Comment Re:I'll say it again... (Score 1) 34

You're right. When VPNs first came out, it was adding encryption when there was none. So, if someone had a span port on you, they could read your HTTP traffic. Now, even P2P traffic on the web is mostly SSL, so there's almost nothing added and you're probably suffering a traffic bottleneck at the VPN. Not to mention that VPN is a veritable span port for anything you're running that isn't over TLS.

Slashdot Top Deals

The cost of feathers has risen, even down is up!

Working...