"OtherOS would be OtherOS all over again"

No!?!

Yeah, and there are plenty of things people stick in there that are labelled as not-bugs by the developers.

It's the PS3 OtherOS all over again. If they didn't have the feature in the first place, fine; but having it and then removing it smells bad.

It's not a bug unless it was an accident.

Somebody and Anybody are on trains headed towards each other at 20mph (each). Construct a boolean algebra equation to describe all actors.

Or like how that studio told Peter Jackson they didn't have to pay him more than a pittance because Lord of the Rings "didn't turn a profit."

Unethical weasel bastards.

You know, it's like how when more than half of the population uses a word wrong, the meaning changes.

Well, since we're being technical, I wouldn't call it paying them as there's no actual transaction. Satisfy the tax code, sure.

If they're not making any profit, why the hell are they doing business there?

Oh. I read the title as "people flushing unused birth control pills threatens," not "the intended cycle of taking birth control pills and their normal chemical output threatens."

I was under the impression one took them orally, not by jamming them up your urethra.

You mean a "swirly"? The heck is "flerzy" supposed to come from?

Well, it's technically related to my question and we all know that's the best kind of correct.

If you're going to mock me for something you say I've never heard of, at least spell it right so I can google it.

Thanks for your confusing comment that totally fails to help.

If he's doing something that he really doesn't have to, and can easily stop, then yes. Yes, I would say that.

Can't say I ever expected to see somebody on your side of the issue use that argument.

Slapping a label on a viewpoint to glibly dismiss it may work for you, but the issue is hardly so black and white. Congrats on your +5 but I see plenty of people who disagree and aren't modded down.