I think the next poll will be:
Notably more boring than last one
Slightly more boring than last one
Not significantly different than last one
Slightly less boring than last one
Notably less boring than last one
It will talk about the weather again!

Could you give an example of a weapon that disables someone for 24 hours? Most weapons would disable for minutes or hours (flashbang, tear gas, taser, tranquilizers), or for weeks or months (eg bullets).

Worst is something that will almost certainly kill you, but does it slowly. More humane, but hardly different in the end, is something that kills you quickly. Best is something that takes you out of commission for a while, but causes no permanent damage. Fairly rotten is something that has a tendency to cause permanent disability, but less likely to kill. This last one causes a lot of damage to militaries and governments, even if individuals would prefer to be permanently disabled then killed. Although bullets can maim, they generally result in either a recoverable wound, or death. Conversely, weak lasers will only result in temporary or permanent eye damage, and have enough ammo that you can fire it continuously.

But how long until googling becomes the standard term for any web search? It is conveniently shorter, after all. And probably more specific, since search engines sometimes search stuff not directly on the web.

I see that your skill at identifying other people's knowledge is consistent with your skill at understanding mathematical theorems.

"High School Student Builds Gun That Unlocks With Your Fingerprint"

I feel so special! But, how did he get my fingerprint?

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but did Mr Logan have a warrant to search all of Washington? And where's his probable cause? Or maybe his search for child porn, wasn't a search?

To put it in a different perspective, one person was violating the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution in order to enforce a law violating the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. And everyone thinks his victim is the dangerous one.

Wow... a reality show that actually depicts reality!

No, when it's an Apple product it is strengthened by iOns.

Or it could have been too expensive and Apple decided that secret failed drop tests forced them to gallantly abandon the project in favor of the cheaper alternative.

So it was indeed that you misunderstood Godel's incompleteness theorem. Yes, I'm aware of it, and was even suspecting that was what you had misunderstood, but wanted to hear from you just in case it wasn't. Anyhow, the theorem says nothing about the laws of nature -- only that every (certain kind of mathematical system) will have a true statement that will be unprovable in that system. But there is no hint that one of the unprovable things might be a law of nature, and if it were you could simply prove it in a different mathematical system.

What science can't do is produce absolutely certain deductive proofs. This is because science does not start with axioms but rather tries to discover them by induction. I'd also note that the axioms of science implied by the scientific method (ie, that the universe's laws are consistent across time and space, and that the universe is objective rather than subjective) can't ever be proven either. Of course, axioms by their very nature can never be proven.

PS: If you were interested in Godel's Incompleteness Theorem, you may also be interested in Turing's Halting Problem.

So that we'll deserve it?

Sure it is. By faith you can know it is true that you believe the thing you have faith about.

I've never heard of such a thing. It sounds like something you made up or misunderstood.