Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hope it's better... (Score 1) 119

...than my android powered LG 47G2 "smart" TV - it SUCKS! Google updated android in spite of everything I tried to prevent it, and broke a LOT of functions. And there's no way to back out of the "upgrades". I called LG and they blame google. Google says it is an issue with LG. I bet the same thing happens with Firefox OS and these new TVs.

And why would we not assume this?

Think about it for a minute, you're an owner of a product with a 7-10 year useful lifespan. You're being approached by vendors that have a notorious reputation for going out of date with their products within months, sometimes sooner. Are you going to be willing to partner with any of them without being able to point the finger back at them when shit goes wrong?

And we see this shit happen all the time. It's gotten to the point where they should just call it the legal finger pointing loophole.

Comment Re:Updates (Score 1) 119

...At the end of the day I think that other than malware targets these things are gonna quickly become irrelevant, the OS will go out of date looong before the TV dies, making for a security nightmare as vulnerabilities in both the OS and the apps won't be able to be patched as the hardware will just be too weak to run anything newer, and for the consumer the apps will lose support and using the ones that come with it will be about as pleasant as trying to surf modern sites on the phone I listed above. So other than a checkbox on the side of the box? IMHO this is just fucking stupid any way you cut it.

Says you, the consumer of said hardware.

Tell me again why a manufacturer or reseller of said hardware would give a shit about their hardware becoming slightly out of date and lacking features in 2-3 years?

At the beginning of the day, they give a shit about one thing; revenue.

At the end of the day, they give a shit about one thing; revenue.

In other words, the vendors of the world already have a solution for you. It's engineered right into the product.

Comment Re:Major changes in many countries (Score 1) 333

oh, I dunno...figuring out how to not ensure demand stays at 100%.

An obvious first step is to start treating addiction as a medical problem rather than as a criminal problem. Maybe we should spend less on police and prison guards, and more on doctors and nurses.

Alcoholism was officially defined as a disease over half a century ago, paving the way for treatment centers to open all across the country with full official support and backing from the medical and insurance community.

What was the direct impact on alcoholism today? By the time you finish reading this sentence, three more humans will become addicted to alcohol.

Treating addiction as a medical problem? Oh yeah. I can really tell how well that fucking tactic worked out...

Comment Re:Sudafed (Score 1, Offtopic) 333

Fun fact: English is not a dead language. Proper usage shifts over time.

Uh, proper usage? Of the word rigmarole?

You mean when we stopped calling it balderdash because it was too old-fashioned, or when we stopped calling it a clusterfuck due to the overly protective censors?

Bullshit words deserve their ongoing confusion, and belong in the Urban Dictionary and not much further.

Comment Re:Major changes in many countries (Score 0) 333

If we eliminated the need to grow opium, a some countries would find their economies transformed. Imagine Afghanistan without opium financing various criminal factions. We just need to figure out how to make cocaine without coca, and Middle America would be changed too.

Of course that relies on the secret getting out. Otherwise we are still stuck with the morass of violent crime.

Yes, let's figure out ways to continue to make the drugs that kills us without using the base products instead of oh, I dunno...figuring out how to not ensure demand stays at 100%.

After all, it's obvious the inherent problem to solve with cocaine addiction is the cocoa leaf.

I'm certain the cure for obesity is smaller forks too.

Comment Re:what might go wrong (Score 1) 119

Let me see... A shitty "OS" on a low-powered, very cheap SoC and difficult to upgrade? What can go wrong?

Let me see... You would prefer a solid "OS" on a nicely embedded device, along with the flexibility to upgrade easily over the 5-7 year expected lifetime of a TV product?

No problem. Hope you don't mind taking out a multi-year loan for that $15,000 television set.

The words very cheap have never rung so hard in your wallet. And today, when something doesn't work due to obsolescence, the answer is to throw it away and buy a new one, thus defining the problem as there isn't a problem here, according to the vendors.

The hardware you want doesn't exist unless you make it. And it it's not planned either. To guarantee revenue.

Comment Re:Voyager 1 and 2 (Score 2) 403

These puppies are way out there, running on neclear power. No-one to bug them, nothing to break them.

Nothing?

Because there are not millions of objects hurtling through our universe at any given moment, as we sit here and theorize what large object might have wiped out all life on this planet before?

The universe is nothing but one big pinball machine. Luck runs out eventually.

Comment Re:Why are we asking this... (Score 1) 435

..when we are not ready to mitigate every single scenario in which a human driver would need to take over and drive in an emergency?

We still haven't solved every scenario where a robot driver should be taking over from a human driver in an emergency. We're already very tolerant of tired, distracted, or intoxicated drivers, so why would we demand perfection from a robot?

Robots just need to crash less than humans to be useful. That's not asking much.

And if someone does not drive while tired, distracted or especially intoxicated, I'd say it's quite a bit to ask of a human to step into a robot-controlled car that has statistically been accepted as barely better than the "average" drunk on the road texting.

Sure there are many factors that are truly out of our control on the road. But there are also a shitload that we DO control that insurance companies use all the time to determine who is a safe driver and who is not.

Comment Re:There has never been any justification (Score 1) 200

So long as an American citizen is travelling within the US, even if by air, there is no justification for any search or seizure of his or her personal documents, thoughts, or even religion.

My laptop may contain personal information, and only with a specific court order by a judge (not a blanket warrant for "all Americans") can they force us to reveal our personal data or thoughts.

It doesn't matter what their excuse is.

Can they scan it for potential hazards, or ask us to turn it on to "prove" it is not a hazard?

Sure.

But that is all the Gestapo can do.

You let me know how good you feel after $10,000 is spent on lawyers fees and you "win" your case against the Gestapo here.

Oh don't worry, You're right. The problem is it's going to cost YOU several thousand dollars to simply defend yourself and PROVE you're right.

Comment Re:Not for animals or locations (Score 1) 186

Makes sense. You name a disease for a location and nobody wants to go there.

Yes, because there has been no one living within 100 miles of the Ebola river since 1976. A clear case of cause and effect.

You name a disease for a creature and it's open season on that creature - and the destroys any business that uses them.

Wow. We should expect Chick-Fil-A to shut their doors minute now, along with a lot of farms. After all, how the hell can anyone expect to eat poultry after hearing the words "chicken pox". Oh the horror, look at the humans run away!

Oh wait, my mistake. Those humans were merely waddling out of the KFC restaurant. Clearly humanity is paranoid as they serve up another helping.

What's that? You mean they actually called it "swine flu" and yet bacon sales and cholesterol levels never changed?!? I'm shocked, shocked I tell you...

Perhaps you should reconsider this train of thought. It doesn't seem to follow reality. At all.

Comment 13 years too early to be asking (Score 1) 515

"How much would you be willing to pay to take a fast train between L.A. and San Francisco?"

Guess that depends...how much faith do you have in guessing what our economy is going to do in the next decade?

A global economic meltdown and subsequent bank bailouts were the highlights of the last decade, so feel free to sit around and pull theories clean out of your ass as to the value of the [insert new global monetary standard here] in 2028.

Comment Re:It's the same old lies from these H1B advocates (Score 1) 612

This was about money, plain and simple. And any fucking moron who wants to stand up and claim otherwise will earn their title of fucking moron for assuming the rest of us are as dumb and ignorant as they are.

They don't assume you'll believe the lie, they simply assume you'll go along with it, because what else are you going to do, comrade?

You are correct. I assumed they actually give a flying fuck about being wrong.

Or immoral. Or unethical. Or even illegal.

They don't, because we don't actually enforce laws anymore.

Slashdot Top Deals

The 11 is for people with the pride of a 10 and the pocketbook of an 8. -- R.B. Greenberg [referring to PDPs?]

Working...