A New Concept in Supercomputers 113
Steve Kerrison writes "With the power of CPUs ever-increasing and the number of cores in a system increasing too, having a supercomputer sit under your desk is no longer a pipe dream. But generally speaking, the extreme high end of modern computing consists of a big ugly box housing that generates a lot of noise. A UK system integrator has developed a concept PC that blows that all away. The eXtreme Concept PC (XCP) has quite a romantic design story, with inspiration coming from concept cars and the sarcophagus-like Cray T90. The end result is a system that resembles a Cylon — computing power never looked so ominous. Although just a concept, the company behind the design reckons there could be a (small) market for the systems, with varying levels of compute power accompanied by appropriate (say, LN2) cooling."
Bad Childish Design (Score:5, Insightful)
Supercomputers? (Score:0, Insightful)
No thanks. (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't need the very best computer, but if I needed/wanted the best, cost be damned...
That's hardly something that would fit under my desk. And there's no discussion of performance specs, just a bunch of hype. Besides, with serviceability taking a back seat, you won't be able to upgrade the thing readily, probably making it at the top of its game only for a few months.
It'd be nice.. (Score:3, Insightful)
I like simple. (Score:2, Insightful)
Not by any means a 'supercomputer' (Score:5, Insightful)
Nowadays, the most recent list has the #500 supercomputer at nearly 6 teraflops (rpeak of 10 teraflops). Or, to quantify, the lowest of the top 500 is still 100 times more powerful than one of these boxes.
Supercomputer in your palm, supercomputer in the desk, as long as you get to pick the year by which you declare what a 'supercomputer' is, you can declare whatever you want.
What has happened to /.? (Score:5, Insightful)
That's Just a Casemodded PC, Not a Supercomputer (Score:5, Insightful)
The only thing any supercomputer has to do with that machine is that the vendor's tech director bought an old Cray:
I bet my P4/4.3GHz non-super computer is faster than that old Cray. And there's no way a single 2*4*x86+4*GPU PC is a supercomputer [top500.org] at all.
And that case is hella ugly.
Re:Not by any means a 'supercomputer' (Score:3, Insightful)
One of the staples of being a supercomputer (same with mainframes) is their high availability.
Will this system let you swap out CPUs or RAM while running? How bout all of the rest of the hardware?
Can you perform a two or more stage swap over and upgrade the -entire- base of hardware, so that the applications on the OS don't even realize it happened, essentially replacing the entire system live?
Can it detect bad/failed CPUs or newly added CPUs with design flaws, kick them out of the to-use list, and have the apps underneath chug along on their marry way with no ill effects? Bad RAM? Bad bus controller chips zapped by static?
If not, then it is no where near a supercomputer, nor even reaching a mainframe level.
This is, at best, a high end desktop/server, and at worst, just a regular computer, for any year.
The mark of high availability is, as long as you feed the system with power, and replace failed parts, you should be able to replace any/all failed parts with the system running, the apps will never know, and the OS will not act any differently when this happens (outside of the guts of it, having to manage said changes transparently, and probably notifying someone that it found bad hardware and needs it replaced)
Re:Bad Childish Design (Score:2, Insightful)