Fedora Core 6 Released 230
Shadowman writes "Fedora Core 6 has been released. Recommended download method is via BitTorrent. For more information, see the release notes or the Fedora homepage.
Slashdot interviewed the Fedora Project Leader back in August."
Re:Release Notes Mirror & Thoughts (Score:1, Insightful)
They mean gratis, not necessarily freedom. (Score:3, Insightful)
They mean gratis, not that this plugin necessarily gives you the freedoms of free software (for those of you who live in countries saddled with software patents). You could install and run this plugin but doing so would be installing non-free software on your machine. For the rest of you, the Fluendo GStreamer MP3 plugin is free software, licensed under the MIT X11 license. Richard Stallman, founder of the free software movement, talked about this during the first GPLv3 conference [archive.org] when discussing what was then known as the "Liberty or Death" clause of the upcoming GPL. The GPL strives to not only create software freedom (the freedom to share and modify computer programs) but defend it in the face of new threats like software patents (patents on algorithms used in computer software):
I discussed this some more at the time on my blog [digitalcitizen.info].
FC's Package Manager (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Fedora 6 patches to KDE are buggy, unpolished (Score:3, Insightful)
Fedora is definitely the worst offender when it comes to KDE support. Instead of their crappy old "blue curve" theme and replacing all the KDE default apps with crappy gnome ones (File Roller anyone?) it would be much preferable for them to just leave KDE alone... just let the defaults fall where they may as they come from the KDE gods.
I use Gentoo on my desktop... so I _know_ how good KDE can be when not messed with. I use FC5 (and 6 as soon as possible) on my laptop (I like the network manager and all the suspend/hibernate/resume stuff worked immediately... all of that is sometimes non-trivial with Gentoo) and in the research lab I help run at school... and the differences between FC5 and Gentoo are huge. At school I actually have setup a whole system tree where I put hand compiled versions of lots of KDE and related software that is either outdated or broken in FC5. I also spent a good deal of time undoing the Redhat intrusion of Gnome into KDE (and of course replacing the horrible theme stuff).
But... Redhat has always been about Gnome... so we shouldn't expect much. In the end, if you're a KDE person FC5 (and it sounds like FC6) probably aren't for you. For now, I put up with it because it is doing what I need in specific cases... even if it takes a while to massage it.
Friedmud
Re:Not to troll, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
The whole point of Fedora is to be bleeding edge, not to be 100% stable. Fedora introduces bleeding edge features, and Red Hat fixes the features, that's how it is, and that's how it is supposed to be. If you can't cope with bleeding edge features that are not guaranteed to be stable, then Fedora is simply not for you.
Ubuntu makes Fedora look like useless because those teams work hard on bug fixes.
Ubuntu aims for usability and stability, Fedora aims for bleeding edge. Different distros, different goals. Use the right tool for your job.
Re:CentOS? (Score:3, Insightful)
Your new version is going to have to read the old config file formats for compatibility for bob-knows-how-many years anyway, so now not only do you need to support XML, you still have to support J.Q.Random's BNF, and a converter between the XML and the old config format.
Good luck getting the glibc guys to support a new