IBM's Counterclaim 10 Outlines 5 Ways SCO's Wrong 121
ColonelZen writes "My article at IPW reads: But, however slowly, the wheels of justice do grind on. The discovery phase of SCO v. IBM is now complete, and as per the court's schedule the time to raise Summary Judgment issues is now. And IBM has indeed raised them ... such that it is very possible that all of SCO's claims against IBM could wind up dismissed piecemeal in those motions. ... Yesterday, IBM's redacted memo in support of CC10 hit Pacer. ... This is 102 pages detailing five independent but overlapping, direct and powerfully detailed reasons why SCO's claims of Linux infringement against its code are nonsense."
Claims? (Score:5, Funny)
It just me, or does this read like spam? (Score:5, Funny)
Dear SCO, (Score:5, Funny)
You filthy teabaggers.
Re:Claims? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It just me, or does this read like spam? (Score:5, Funny)
FTFA:
Nope, I think paragraph long sentences and stuffing yout text with rare words in inappropriate locations is a very good way to get your message accross.
Refund for Microsoft? (Score:4, Funny)
from SCO to use some Unix code.
Re:the US system (Score:5, Funny)
If you risked that evert time you filed a frivolous lawsuit, you'd think twice, wouldn't you?
- Greg
Re:the US system (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Reason why is probably $$$ (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Maybe IBM has also slowed progress. (Score:3, Funny)
I can't see Rumsfeld doing that.
The dog is laughing at SCO (Score:4, Funny)
And then Nintendo sues SCO, alleging that "Nuke Ducks Forever" is based on Nintendo's "Duck Hunt" game for NES. Even the dog is laughing at SCO.
Re:Reason why is probably $$$ (Score:3, Funny)