Impressive GPU Numbers From Folding@Home 201
ludd1t3 writes, "The Folding@Home project has put forth some impressive performance numbers with the GPU client that's designed to work with the ATI X1900. According to the client statistics, there are 448 registered GPUs that produce 29 TFLOPS. Those 448 GPUs outperform the combined 25,050 CPUs registered by the Linux and Mac OS clients. Ouch! Are ASICs really that much better than general-purpose circuits? If so, does that mean that IBM was right all along with their AS/400, iSeries product which makes heavy use of ASICs?"
Are ASICs really that much better? (Score:5, Funny)
Generally ASICs are much better than general-purpose circuits except in general cases.
IBM right all along, or obvious? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So obvious... (Score:5, Funny)
Distributed amongst home users (Score:5, Funny)
Solomon
I KNEW it! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:So obvious... (Score:2, Funny)
- No, that's what consoles are for.
Re:This is the perfect time... (Score:3, Funny)
That makes it a little better... right?
Please?
Re:Distributed amongst home users (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So obvious... (Score:5, Funny)
Golly Beav.... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: Are ASICs really that much better? (Score:3, Funny)
You realize that somebody is bound to write a word processor that runs on a GPU now, just to prove it can be done?
Re:Lopsided Alright..ASIC and yea shall receive. (Score:3, Funny)
"I can think of many, many things at once. As long as they are the same type of thing."
Re: Are ASICs really that much better? (Score:3, Funny)