Xbox 360 adds 1080p Support 349
jayintune writes "2old2play has received news from the TGS (Tokyo Game Show) that Microsoft plans on releasing an update that will enable 1080p support on their Xbox 360 console. From the article, "users can expect 1080p upscaling immediately on current games and DVDs while native 1080p on compatible HD DVD titles." What could this mean for Sony now that MS has 1080p as well?" Now honestly, show of hands: who has their console (not PC!) connected to a display device capable of 1080p? Who plans on buying a device capable of 1080p?
1080p, me! (Score:1, Informative)
more importantly... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:(Raises hand!) (Score:4, Informative)
Re:random number with a letter at the end (Score:5, Informative)
Re:1080p, me! (Score:5, Informative)
No-one in Australia transmits anything at 1080p. ABC and SBS "HD" are 576p, although they have almost no "real" HD content - most all of it is upsampled SD. Seven is also 576p, although I think their "HD" broadcasts actually have 1080i sources. Both Nine and Ten broadcast in 1080i (even sport, which kind of sucks).
Re:7 Years Late (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What does this mean for monitors? (Score:2, Informative)
Matt
Re:more importantly... (Score:3, Informative)
The judder, by the way, is only rarely noticeable and is pretty much the same everywhere else AFAIK, but it would be nice to get rid of it. The software infrastructure for detecting the frame rate of the source and auto-switching the display mode just isn't there though. In other words, I want it to be 60hz most of the time, and automatically switch to 24 or 48 hz when I'm watching a DVD that originally came from a (24 fps) film source, but not when I'm watching a DVD that originally came from a (30 fps) video source. Getting the display and X and the media players to work together to do that is a little way off though AFAICT.
This is my X modeline:
ModeLine "1920x1080" 138.5 1920 1968 2000 2080 1080 1082 1087 1111
The standard autodetection/setup in Fedora Core 4 didn't set up the display right, but after trying it, I found the above numbers by looking in the X log output.
1080p not as expensive as you think (Score:4, Informative)
Re:1080p - NO ONE has that (Score:1, Informative)
The AVS Forum threads on these things are huge--there must be a fair number of people buying them.
It's not technically a TV since there's no tuner, but that doesn't matter for the xbox.
Re:I have 1080p already but.. (Score:2, Informative)
Also a lot of folks with new HD stuff don't give their TV scalers enough credit, these things are good, most of them excellent, especially in the big-brand sets. So doing what you are doing is definately the smarter way to go for a crisper un-raped signal.
Re:3rd question (Score:3, Informative)
Both the VGA cable and the Component cable do support 1080p. The only issue is that most of the 1080p TVs sold do not support 1080p over component. There are some [westinghousedigital.com] exceptions [samsung.com], but generally they don't. But there's a lot more TVs that accept VGA and DVI, which will handle 1080p fine.
This still doesn't answer the ICT question of course, so we should assume that ICT protected movies wont work. It sucks, but the less DRM support around, the better.
Re:Fancy but no more (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Interlaced Vs Progressive (Score:3, Informative)
Except it's updating half the lines, meaning any object moving will have the jagged edges of interlaced content. That fucks a lot more with your mind than a smooth line moving at 30fps. Try playing any video game (probably the most intense need for "smooth" you'll have) in interlaced. What's that? Every monitor you've had in the last 10 years is progressive? I can't imagine why that would be...
The only good thing about 60i content is that you can restore movies shot in 24p back to 24p through 3:2 pulldown, which would have been a lot harder with 30p but I'd take 1080p30 over 1080i60 on a progressive (NB: Not interlaced!!!) screen any day. Now, 1080i60 vs 720p60 is tougher, because you lose detail in low-motion screens, but gain smoothness in high-motion screens. 1080p60 would be king of the hill, no doubt about that.
Re:What does this mean for monitors? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I have 1080p already but.. (Score:3, Informative)
I see this argument all the time. I have to disagree with you. Let's look at the actual resolution for each signal.
720p: 1280x720
1080i: 1920x540 (for all practical purposes)
1080p: 1920x1080
Now, let's figure this out in terms of that oh-so-popular megapixel:
720p: .9MP (921,600)
1080i: 1MP (1,036,800)
1080p: 2MP (2,073,600)
So while a 1080i signal may not contain as much vertical resolution, the horizontal resolution is still much greater, producing 115,200 more pixels than 720p.
Each signal has it's own merits, just don't go touting 720p as having a greater resolution than 1080i.
Re:more importantly... (Score:2, Informative)
FTA
Emphasis mine of course... I see a few problems with what's going on here.
But no HDMI? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Dude, what about HD DVD (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I have 1080p already but.. (Score:3, Informative)
You have to remember that when you have an interlaced signal, the two interlaced frames are not from the same time frame. With CRT's it is not a big deal as your eyes and brain fill in the difference nicely (between scans). But when you have to convert it to a digital display, it becomes a very difficult problem.
Once you have 1080P, it will look superior to 720P since you are skipping at least one additional upconverting step.