Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Download From Microsoft Without a WGA Check 195

Anonymous Coward writes, "When you want to download a file from Microsoft, a WGA (Windows Genuine Advantage) check is performed. Microsoft installs a small piece of software on your computer that contacts the Microsoft server and checks the validity of your installed Windows software. If the test fails you will not be able to download the file(s). The following method gives you the ability to download every file from Microsoft without a WGA check."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Download From Microsoft Without a WGA Check

Comments Filter:
  • One thing (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cow_licker ( 172474 ) on Tuesday September 05, 2006 @08:52PM (#16049051)
    All recent files on there check once more for "authentic" installs once you run the downloaded file.
  • basically (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 05, 2006 @08:59PM (#16049089)
    On each download page, add &Hash=6VJPCR9 to the url and you can download without the check.
    The code changes regularly, at which time you need mgadiag.exe to find the new code.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 05, 2006 @09:12PM (#16049149)
    You don't even need some silly executable to find the daily hashes to append to the url. Microsoft provides a ready community [google.sh] where the latest codes are reported!
  • by Bing Tsher E ( 943915 ) on Tuesday September 05, 2006 @09:20PM (#16049178) Journal
    Not having a valid windows system handy I was willing to run a somewhat questionable executable on,

    That sentence alone is enough to get me riled up. Granted, I'm one of the people who stepped gracefully off the Microsoft Bus as soon as 'Product Validation' became a reality. (I even run Windows 2000 and the first version of Office 2000, which are the two last versions on their respective lines to not have the 'phone home' features)

    It sorta chills me to think of being afraid to run particular binaries on a machine that I own and am legitimate owner of, because a 'phone home' feature will nark on me.

    My copies of Windows 2000 and Office 2000 are the full retail-box versions (about the most expensive way possible to buy Microsoft's products). I used to buy a lot of their stuff. Not any longer. And I'm not alone.
  • Re:Why the fuck.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by matt328 ( 916281 ) on Tuesday September 05, 2006 @09:59PM (#16049341)
    As I mentioned in a post in a different article, I've had a painfully annoying run in with Window Activate while in the middle of a computer upgrade.

    I feel your pain. I provide all our company's in house tech support. If a machine goes down and needs a hard drive replaced, I don't fudge around calling up Microsoft when the WPA thing starts bitching. I have a utility that patches an operating system file, and bam, no more WPA or WGA bullshit. If they want to accuse me of being a pirate, they can come on in and look at the product key hologram stickers on every box I do this to. Its not that I'm pirating it, I just don't have time to jump through all their hoops. Alot of my users do all their work on the computer, and if its down for more than 2 hours or so I start to get flak.
  • Car Analogy (Score:3, Interesting)

    by SteveTheRed ( 244567 ) on Tuesday September 05, 2006 @11:18PM (#16049702) Homepage
    Would you buy a car if you had to get your VIN checked every time that you needed to buy parts for it? Would you buy a car if you knew that there was going to be a manufacturer recall almost every day that required replacing or adding parts? I'll add a twist: what if you thought that same brand of car was the only brand allowed in your company parking lot? What if you thought that brand of car was the only brand of car that you could get parts for?

    I think that the above hypothetical scenario is a simple analogy of what I like to call "The Windows Problem". Nobody likes WGA. Nobody likes the endless parade of patches and hotfixes that require a reboot as often as not. Nobody likes having to be ever vigilant against security threats. People are starting to see that Windows is very flawed. Since we as a society have spent the majority of our IT budget for the last 20 years on making this one OS the (often) only platform for our IT solutions, how do we change course now?

    There are those who believe that once people hear the Good News about Linux they will throw off their Microsoft shackles and march hand-in-hand into the FOSS promised land. OK, maybe I overstated that a little, but you get the point and you know the type. Ubuntu is ridiculously easy to install, but my mother couldn't do it. She uses XP because that's what Dell installed on her computer. Even though she sees Windows as the only reasonable alternative, she still bitches about it. "Normal" people had a hard enough time getting Windows to do what they want it to do, and they'll be damned if they are going to learn it all over again.

    Unless everyone else switches first.
  • by mcrbids ( 148650 ) on Wednesday September 06, 2006 @01:37AM (#16050188) Journal
    I used to buy a lot of their stuff. Not any longer. And I'm not alone.

    But you're in a very small room. Most people don't know or care about stuff like this. It measures somewhere between a traffic fine for accidentally running a red light and being late for a video rental.

    And how many people do you represent? Do you buy for a corporation? Large group? Somehow, I doubt it.

    I'm an OSS kinda guy (I write this on my Fedora Core system, using Mozilla) and love it, and have even made sure that our software works on Windows, Mac, and Linux - but none of our customers have *EVER* used our Linux software. A small (but meaningful) percentage of our users are on Macs.

    Truth is, much as we who are interested in this stuff might like otherwise, this stuff just doesn't matter to most people - and to those whom it does, Microsoft really is cheaper.

    Ever try to support desktop software? Yes, it's getting worse on Windows, but it's still not too bad, compared to supporting some XYZ linux flavor:

    Q. What Operating System are you using?
    A. Linux
    Q. Ok, what UI are you using?
    A. What?
    Q. I mean, what Window Manager?
    A. What's that?
    Q. When you click on the start button, what do you see?
    A. There is no "Start" button...
    Q. Is there a button where you click on to run a program?
    A. Yeah.
    Q. When you click on it, what does it say?
    A. Enter Command
    Q. That's it, "Enter Command"?
    A. Yes.
    Q. So how do you do stuff?
    A. What kind of stuff?
    Q. You know, look at a website.
    A. Oh, a website! I use Firefox!
    Q. Good, how do you find FireFox?
    A. It's on my desktop!
    Q. So are you using Gnome or KDE?
    A. I don't know what you're talking about.
    Q. (deep sigh)
    A. So, you're looking at a screen, right?
    Q. Yes.
    A. And there's a task bar on it, right?
    Q. No. ......

    See where this is going? Linux is not for end users. It probably could be - but it just isn't there now. Ubuntu just might be getting there. Macintosh OSX is there. But for end users, only through some very controlled interface, and in some limited capacity.

    Now, I was talking with my father-in-law the other day, and he indicated that he would *never* use Linux. I laughed, and told me that he did, every day. And not only that, but he raved to me about it!

    With a look of surprise, he asked me how/where - and I pointed to his Dish DVR. (which is Linux-based, all the way down to an ext2/3 filesystem)
  • WTF (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Agram ( 721220 ) <ico AT vt DOT edu> on Wednesday September 06, 2006 @01:42AM (#16050201) Homepage
    What's wrong with this picture: a company (granted, not with much of a positive reputation) tries to minimize rampant piracy by encouraging validation of your purchased license. In return you get 5 years worth of free updates plus additional software, which although of dubious value is still free as in beer (i.e. Security Center, Firewall, Malicious Software Removal, etc.). Does Windows have tons of problems? Yes. Is it totally crappy? Hell. no. Is this move something to bitch about? Absolutely not. People especially from the Apple camp should hold their tongues as even though OSX is a lot less prone to exploits (it's not that simple but for the sake of conserving valuable bandwidth, let's leave it for the time being as such), since OSX release in 2001, if users wanted to keep-up with updates, we had to dish out $100/year for every incremental update since (and some of which were touting bug fixes as one of "hundreds" of new features). All in all, we are talking about another ~$500.00 since year 2001. Now, on Windows, yes one had to get anti-virus software et al, but most of that is, believe it or not, free (google for AVG anti-virus suite for instance). So, when the Vista comes out with a $400 price tag for the top enterprise package, I think that should still leave Windoze users with a nice Franklin smiling in their pockets. Now, as far as security and virii go, that's yet to be seen...

    All that being said, I've written this post on my triple-booting MBP. And just for the record: after having dealt for many years with all of them, I have to admit that I hate Windows, OSX, and Linux with passion (ok, Linux less so simply due to its philosophical supremacy), despite the fact that (or should I perhaps say because?) I use all three on a more-or-less daily basis...
  • Works with WINE... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by CrezzyMan ( 4386 ) on Wednesday September 06, 2006 @09:24AM (#16051535) Homepage
    Ran MGADiag on Wine / Fedora Core 5 and the hash it spat out worked like a charm.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...