Microsoft Recalls Small Business Server 237
dasButcher writes to tell us VarBusiness is reporting that hot on the heels of many other delays, Microsoft has recalled their Small Business Server 2003 R2. The operating system started shipping to OEMs, distributors, and systems builders in July but was immediately recalled after a recent audit.
What's getting deleted? WinFS??? (Score:2, Interesting)
SBS made me quit my job... (Score:5, Interesting)
humm (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:SBS made me quit my job... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:SBS made me quit my job... (Score:4, Interesting)
- SMTP
- POP
- DNS
- Apache (hosting mediawiki, mantis, dotproject, phpMyAdmin)
- MySQL (for the mentioned web apps)
- A SAMBA fileserver
- DHCP
The only thing that's not in that server is the firewall... which I kept in a different machine with no services running whatsoever, except those that handle our aDSL connection (pppoe, and sshd to connect from inside the LAN).
Our setup is not great on redundancy... but we can afford a couple of days of downtime (we had to, once or twice over the years) more than we can afford doubling our setup. Our services are used by a small number of employees (six, actually) and none are critical.
If Microsoft wants to pull us away from Linux they'd have to offer a Windows Server with all they usual servers (like those you mentioned), even if they're somewhat limited to prevent being used in a large corporation (max database size, max number of clients, etc.), priced appropiately for the use we'd give it. This product sounds like what we'd need... despite some companies misusing it for some reason.
Legal precedent? (Score:2, Interesting)
One can imagine, if given any serious fault or bug, Microsoft would be obligated to recall copies of their OS. Given that nowdays the OS is a crucial component for several business, can the justice force Microsoft to do it?
After all, if they sell a defective product, that can cause severe harm to its consumers... I guess it's Microsof responsability to fix the damage. I don't know about the USA, but here at Brazil the EULA means nothing, since it can't deny any rights given to the consumer by the constitution or by federal laws.
Re:SBS made me quit my job... (Score:5, Interesting)
You would have to streamline everything a lot though:
- The customer isn't expected to do anything with the server. That's the support companies job (this isn't a million miles away from how a lot of these places work anyhow, so that's not a big deal).
- Installation is nailed down to "insert CD, turn system on". All the configuration is pre-done by the support company, and every customer gets the same configuration. The customer doesn't do the install anyhow, the company sends someone to site if necessary, but the fact that everything is already nailed down means that you could get away with shaving a chimpanzee, putting them in a shirt and tie and sending them out to site.
- Server hardware is specified (and usually supplied by) the support company.
- Desktops aren't heavily locked down, but are locked down enough to minimise the likelihood of someone completely hosing their system. Combine that with Ghost, and running as much as possible from the server, and the desktop support overhead almost evaporates.
You could easily charge £a few thousand per company per annum doing this - for the customer, it's a lot cheaper than paying a fulltime IT person when they probably only need a couple of man days a month, and gives them peace of mind.
Re:Non-final? (Score:1, Interesting)
What bullshit (Score:1, Interesting)
Pure bullshit and spindoctoring.
Yeah, they're a big fish (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:where did you read that? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:SBS made me quit my job... (Score:3, Interesting)
Speaking as a freelance IT consultant, SBS servers, esp those which haven't been imaged initially for quick restoration after everything is working right and which have been running for a few years are a *fucking disaster* to manage. Nothing is transparent, and when something b0rks, you often have to resort to downloading random patches from MS and hoping they'll work.
Most small businesses need a file server, possibly a mail/calendar server, maybe a domain controller (actually, one-login-per-machine isn't horrible IMHO), maybe a VPN server, a DNS server, a DHCP server, a VPN gateway and a print server. All of which can be handily be accomplished with a net-installed Debian system in 5 or 6 hours. Assuming a consultant charging $70/hr, that's $350-420.
Then pay a few hundred a year for a consultant to manage the server remotely via SSH. Small price to pay for a quality server, or at least my clients seem to think so.
-b.
Re:I feel your pain (Score:3, Interesting)
At least they recall it! (Score:3, Interesting)
But nothing was done except providing a nearly nonvisible update, and this issue has caused nearly untamable mailstorms damaging customer reputation, ringing up traffic bills, and causing lots of grief. At least they demonstrated that not everyone can write a fetchmail clone.
The typical customer for this package has no means at all to point out what was happening, and the system integrators usually only come by to look maybe the next day or so.
(when they tried remote access over the same internet connection, it would be stuffed with traffic)
At least now they recall it before it is too late.