Forbes Says Vista Not People Ready 362
Diomedes01 writes "Daniel Lyons has an opinion piece up on Forbes.com about a recent press conference held by Microsoft, and the results are anything but flattering."
"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds
Re:Rejection (Score:5, Informative)
If the new Office/Vista interfaces are too different from the current Windows setup, the training budget will be cheaper to go to a Linux desktop (GNOME or KDE) and use OpenOffice.org. Never mind the license fees to upgrade being saved.
This has become typical of Microsoft. While SQL has gotten better, and they're getting better with Visual Studio and the new version of IE, so many other things are broken. I can't speak for BizTalk 2006, but 2004 has struck me as a huge waste of cash.
I've been trying to justify using MS products for quite some time (aside from the fact that
Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings (Score:3, Informative)
There has got to me more to it than that.
Waddya expect? (Score:4, Informative)
2006 could turn out to be Microsoft's annus horribilis, since the chances must be very high they'll soon have to fess up and say Janaury 2007 is a bad time to launch Vista. And with every day that passes, more folks will get pissed off with the XP malware explosion. Couldn't have happened to nicer guys
Re:My Clinically Inept Siblings (Score:5, Informative)
I sysadmin for a company that does some fashion design. We do indeed use a specialized CAD type program for this. It's output is bascally a blueprint of the garment to give to the manufacturers.
This software is hella expensive.
Re:Rejection (Score:4, Informative)
Most people don't even know what the features of MS office are, let alone prefer it because of them. They use it out of sheer inertia.
Re:Outsource them here! (Score:3, Informative)
Probably Anton van Leeuwenhoek [wikipedia.org].
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Software Assurance and Date Slippage (Score:3, Informative)
Wow. Just wow.
It's so obvious, we all missed it. Thank you. That's some awesome corporate crap in action right there. I'm not even sure I understand all of the implications fully, it's so mind-numbingly corporate-contract-hardball. Wow.
Did these guys all just pay for support contracts that essentially make them paying beta testers? Can someone pick this up and explain what's going on here a little more? I'm fascinated by this contract date expiration date and what it means... what is Microsoft obligated to provide in terms of OS to these support contract holders?
Is this some sort of underhanded way to penalize folks who don't have these contracts, providing further incentive for them to get similar contracts in the future ? Might that imply that the 2007 ship date was envisioned long ago ? Is that too sneaky even for Microsoft, am I reading too much into this ?
Re:Outsource them here! (Score:3, Informative)