Ekiga 2.0 Released 203
Some Anonymous Coward writes "After about one year of development the former GnomeMeeting team has released Ekiga. Ekiga is the successor of the popular GnomeMeeting. Ekiga calls itself the very "first Open Source application to support both H.323 and SIP". Ekiga is based on the h323/sip codebase, provided by the openh323 project. Also introduced with this release is ekiga.net, a platform to provide the community with free sip addresses."
Ekiga? What the hell is an Ekiga? (Score:3, Insightful)
I would have no bloody clue what an Ekiga is if the article hadn't mentioned it was the successor to GnomeMeeting. I'm sure it means something really appropriate in Sanskrit or something. How very clever.
And so, another project winds up with a useless name and they get to wonder why nobody uses their product, because folks see "Ekiga" and have no idea that it does exactly what they need, where GnomeMeeting might've hinted that at least.
-F
Name Change (Score:5, Insightful)
GnomeMeeting to Ekiga is quite probably the single worst name change I've ever seen in a piece of software, commercial or free aside. They went from a name that clearly communicated the software's purpose to something cryptic that isn't even easily pronounceable. (Yes, I am aware of the new name's origin, that doesn't make it any less terrible a name for a software project).
So the new name fails on pretty much every front. It fails to communicate the purpose of the program. It fails to be something the average person will actually remember. It fails to be something that's not going to scare off a neophyte. As a program that's bandied about for inclusion in Gnome proper, this pretty significant IMO.
Re:ANYTHING has to be better... (Score:3, Insightful)
the software did.
Now with names like Ekiga in my menus I won't have a clue.
Re:Name Change (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ekiga? What the hell is an Ekiga? (Score:4, Insightful)
Seriously, is anyone else getting a little sick of the plethora of "me too" comments about the appropriateness of a software product's name on slashdot?
Re:ANYTHING has to be better... (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah, it's like calling a spreadsheet "Excel". How will anyone know what it does with a name like that. Or calling a retailer "Amazon". In the business world you'd be dead in the water if you used names like that.
Re:Ekiga? What the hell is an Ekiga? (Score:3, Insightful)
But in addition to this there is one other major difference - the advertising budget.
Skype has thrown a huge amount of money and resources into turning itself into a 'name' brand and as such it makes sense that they should go with something original and snappy.
Unless we want to put together a community project to fund an advert in New York Times for every open source project it probably makes more sense to pick obvious names.
Re:Ekiga? What the hell is an Ekiga? (Score:3, Insightful)
Get the point? If it's a good app, help expand its user base. If you really want to help, do that. Anyone can sit around and bitch.
Re:Depends (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ekiga? What the hell is an Ekiga? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ekiga? What the hell is an Ekiga? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Name Change (Score:3, Insightful)
You're basically saying that certain names can be vaguely tied to their purposes after you know what they do. But at that point, it really doesn't matter, does it? It's not like these names are are useful descriptions to someone who doesn't already know what the software does (like iPhoto or iTunes). The fact that they still work pretty well shows that software names are just that --- names. Names aren't meant to be descriptive, they're meant to be short and easy to remember. I'm sure your name isn't "annoy guy who hangs out on Slashdot" is it? It's probably something completely undescriptive --- like "John" or "Ted".